No. 25-72
James Randall Moehle v. Florida
Tags: constitutional-mandate criminal-procedure felony-trial jury-composition sixth-amendment williams-precedent
Latest Conference:
2026-01-09
(distributed 3 times)
Question Presented (from Petition)
Whether this Court should reevaluate its decision in Williams v. Florida, 399 U.S. 78 (1970), and hold that twelve-person juries are constitutionally mandated in criminal felony cases – or at least in cases that involve a potential punishment of life imprisonment.
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether this Court should revaluate its decision in Williams v. Florida and hold that twelve-person juries are constitutionally mandated in criminal felony cases
Docket Entries
2026-01-12
Rehearing DENIED.
2025-12-16
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/9/2026.
2025-11-13
Rescheduled.
2025-11-05
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/21/2025.
2025-10-31
Petition of James Randall Moehle for rehearing submitted.
2025-10-31
Petition for Rehearing filed.
2025-10-06
Petition DENIED.
2025-08-20
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/29/2025.
2025-08-19
Waiver of State of Florida of right to respond submitted.
2025-08-19
Waiver of right of respondent State of Florida to respond filed.
2025-08-19
Waiver of right of respondent Florida to respond filed.
2025-07-10
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due August 20, 2025)
2025-05-16
Application (24A1101) granted by Justice Thomas extending the time to file until July 10, 2025.
2025-05-13
Application (24A1101) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from June 10, 2025 to July 10, 2025, submitted to Justice Thomas.
Attorneys
James Randall Moehle
Michael Robert Ufferman — Michael Ufferman Law Firm, P.A., Petitioner
State of Florida
Trisha Meggs Pate — Office of the Attorney General, Respondent