Whether the New York Court of Appeals improperly found a constitutional challenge to a presidential candidate's eligibility 'moot' by ignoring the 'capable of repetition, yet evading review' doctrine

WHETHER, in this U.S. Constitution, Article II, §1, Clause 5 “natural born Citizen ” challenge to the 2024 Democratic candidate for President of the United States, the New York Court of Appeals when finding that claim “moot ” improperly ignored this Court's “capable of repetition, yet evading review ” doctrine established in Moore v. Ogilvie, 394 U. S. 814 (1969). WHETHER, this Court will recognize this extraordinary and pressing constitutional question and promptly direct full judicial consideration by the lower courts to answer the question of who is an Article II, §1, Clause 5 “natural born Citizen ” when to do so now will not vitiate a major party nomination for that office shortly before the next Presidential election? 1