No. 25-780
Leda Health Corporation, a Delaware Corporation v. Bob Ferguson, Governor of Washington, et al.
Response Waived
Tags: commercial-speech content-restriction first-amendment marketing-speech strict-scrutiny viewpoint-discrimination
Key Terms:
SocialSecurity FirstAmendment
SocialSecurity FirstAmendment
Latest Conference:
2026-02-20
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Does a law that bans the sale of otherwise lawful items based exclusively on the content of the seller's truthful marketing burden speech protected by the First Amendment? Do content and viewpoint restrictions on speech avoid strict scrutiny review merely because the speech is commercial in nature?
Docket Entries
2026-02-04
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/20/2026.
2026-02-02
Waiver of Bob Ferguson and Nick Brown of right to respond submitted.
2026-02-02
Waiver of right of respondent Bob Ferguson and Nick Brown to respond filed.
2025-12-29
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due February 4, 2026)
2025-10-22
Application (25A452) granted by Justice Kagan extending the time to file until December 26, 2025.
2025-10-16
Application (25A452) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from October 27, 2025 to December 26, 2025, submitted to Justice Kagan.
Attorneys
Bob Ferguson and Nick Brown
Tera Marie Heintz — Washington State Attorney General's Office, Respondent
Tera Marie Heintz — Washington State Attorney General's Office, Respondent
Leda Health Corporation
Joseph Alexander Little IV — Litson PLLC, Petitioner
Joseph Alexander Little IV — Litson PLLC, Petitioner