No. 25-784
Kiya Cunningham v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., et al.
Tags: amendment-of-pleadings civil-rights discovery-sanctions due-process federal-rules-of-civil-procedure summary-judgment
Key Terms:
SocialSecurity DueProcess
SocialSecurity DueProcess
Latest Conference:
N/A
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 56 and the Due Process Clause permit a district court to strike a non-movant's summary-judgment opposition and enter judgment without considering the nonmovant's record materials, where the court did not afford a meaningful opportunity to respond
Docket Entries
2026-02-04
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including March 6, 2026.
2026-01-23
Motion to extend the time to file a response from February 4, 2026 to March 6, 2026, submitted to The Clerk.
2025-11-14
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due February 4, 2026)
2025-09-19
Application (25A315) granted by The Chief Justice extending the time to file until November 14, 2025.
2025-09-08
Application (25A315) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from September 15, 2025 to November 14, 2025, submitted to The Chief Justice.
Attorneys
Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., et al.
Kevin Joseph Dalton — Fisher Phillips LLP, Respondent
Kevin Joseph Dalton — Fisher Phillips LLP, Respondent