No. 25-805
Kerry Kruskal v. Alan Maestas, et al.
Response Waived
Tags: access-to-courts civil-claims due-process fourteenth-amendment judicial-review procedural-fairness
Key Terms:
AdministrativeLaw Arbitration DueProcess
AdministrativeLaw Arbitration DueProcess
Latest Conference:
2026-02-20
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment is violated when a state court affirms the dismissal of civil claims without findings of fact, without evidentiary hearings, and while repeatedly denying discovery, thereby depriving a litigant of any meaningful opportunity to be heard
Docket Entries
2026-02-04
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/20/2026.
2026-02-03
Waiver of right of respondents Alan Maestas, Maestas Law Firm, P.C., Kimberly Alderman, JOnathan Hull, Paula Ganz, Santiago Chavez to respond filed.
2026-01-27
Waiver of Dwight Thompson of right to respond submitted.
2026-01-27
Waiver of right of respondent Dwight Thompson to respond filed.
2025-12-15
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due February 9, 2026)
Attorneys
Alan Maestas, Maestas Law Firm, P.C., Kimberly Alderman, JOnathan Hull, Paula Ganz, Santiago Chavez
John Slater Campbell — Resnick & Louis, P.C., Respondent
John Slater Campbell — Resnick & Louis, P.C., Respondent
Dwight Thompson
Edward Robert Ricco — Rodey, Dickason, Sloan, Akin & Robb, P.A., Respondent
Edward Robert Ricco — Rodey, Dickason, Sloan, Akin & Robb, P.A., Respondent