No. 25-814

Assata Acey Hackman v. Inductev

Lower Court: Third Circuit
Docketed: 2026-01-09
Status: Pending
Type: Paid
Response Waived
Tags: appellate-jurisdiction constitutional-review evidence-review judicial-procedure pro-se supreme-court-oversight
Latest Conference: 2026-02-20
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Does the oversight of the US Supreme Court permit its lower courts to ignore submitted evidence in order to refuse pro se petitions?

Docket Entries

2026-01-28
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/20/2026.
2026-01-23
Waiver of right of respondent Inductev to respond filed.
Main Document
2025-10-10
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due February 9, 2026)
PetitionAppendixProof of ServiceCertificate of Word Count

Attorneys

Assata A. Hackman
Assata Acey Hackman — Petitioner
Assata Acey Hackman — Petitioner
Inductev
Randall C. Schauer — Fox Rothschild LLP, Respondent
Randall C. Schauer — Fox Rothschild LLP, Respondent