No. 25-830
Adam Kanuszewski, et al. v. Sandip Shah, et al.
Response Waived
Experienced Counsel
Key Terms:
SocialSecurity FourthAmendment Privacy JusticiabilityDoctri
SocialSecurity FourthAmendment Privacy JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference:
N/A
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether a court of appeals may issue binding merits precedent on constitutional claims after those claims have become moot during appeal, and whether the Fourth Amendment permits a State to indefinitely retain and use newborns' highly-private genetic and medical data without informed parental consent
Docket Entries
2026-02-03
Waiver of right of respondents Sandip Shah, Sarah Lyon-Callo, Mary Kleyn, and Elizabeth Hertel to respond filed.
2026-01-09
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due February 12, 2026)
2025-10-15
Application (25A424) granted by Justice Kavanaugh extending the time to file until January 9, 2026.
2025-10-09
Application (25A424) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from November 10, 2025 to January 9, 2026, submitted to Justice Kavanaugh.
Attorneys
Adam Kanuszewski, et al.
Philip Lee Ellison — Outside Legal Counsel PLC, Petitioner
Philip Lee Ellison — Outside Legal Counsel PLC, Petitioner
Sandip Shah, Sarah Lyon-Callo, Mary Kleyn, and Elizabeth Hertel
Ann Maurine Sherman — Michigan Department of Attorney General, Respondent
Ann Maurine Sherman — Michigan Department of Attorney General, Respondent