No. 25-86
Ashok Arora v. Midland Credit Management, et al.
Response Waived
Tags: business-records circuit-split declarant-testimony federal-rules-evidence hearsay-exception summary-judgment
Latest Conference:
2025-09-29
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the district court erred in accepting hearsay declarations under FRE 803(6) and 803(7) without producing underlying business records
Question Presented (from Petition)
is: Whether the district court erred or abused its discretion when, at summary judgment, it accepted declarations asserting hearsay facts —supposedly derived from business records —under the Federal Rules of Evidence 803(6) and 803(7) exceptions for business records, even though the business records from which the declarant claimed to have derived those facts were never produced and not in evidence.
Docket Entries
2025-10-06
Petition DENIED.
2025-08-20
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/29/2025.
2025-08-18
Waiver of Midland Credit Management, et al. of right to respond submitted.
2025-08-18
Waiver of right of respondent Midland Credit Management, et al. to respond filed.
2025-04-28
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due August 22, 2025)
Attorneys
Midland Credit Management, et al.
Theodore Wilson Seitz — Dykema Gossett PLLC, Respondent
Theodore Wilson Seitz — Dykema Gossett PLLC, Respondent