Whether a state court's destruction and suppression of exculpatory evidence violates a litigant's due-process rights under Brady v. Maryland and Mooney v. Holohan

1. Whether a state court ’s destruction and suppression of exculpatory evidence used to enforce MCL § 552.27 support obligations violates a litigant ’s due-process rights under the Fourteenth Amendment and this Court ’s holding in Brady v. Maryland, 373 U.S. 83 (1963), and Mooney v. Holohan, 294 U.S. 103 (1935). 2. Whether a state court ’s reliance on unsworn and knowingly false or contradictory testimony, despite a documented record to the contrary, violates the dueprocess guarantees recognized in Napue v. Illinois, 360 U.S. 264 (1959). 3. Whether a state court ’s refusal to correct a judgment procured through fraud on the court despite verified transcript evidence of judicial misconduct conflicts with this Court ’s decision in Hazel-Atlas Glass Co. v. Hartford-Empire Co., 322 U.S. 238 (1944), and undermines the integrity of the judicial process. 4. Whether the summary dismissal of verified constitutional claims, without findings or hearing, satisfies the standards articulated in Mathews v. Eldridge, 424 U.S. 319 (1976), particularly where the petitioner was barred from further filings after exposing misconduct. i