No. 25-885
United States v. Donte J. Carter
Key Terms:
FourthAmendment CriminalProcedure Privacy JusticiabilityDoctri
FourthAmendment CriminalProcedure Privacy JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference:
N/A
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether perceptions of law enforcement that a court attributes to a particular racial group are a relevant factor in the Fourth Amendment analysis of whether a member of that group has been seized
Question Presented (from Petition)
Whether perceptions of law enforcement that a court attributes to a particular racial group are a relevant factor in the Fourth Amendment analysis of whether a member of that group has been seized. (II)
Docket Entries
2026-02-04
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including March 30, 2026.
2026-02-03
Motion of Donte J. Carter for an extension of time submitted.
2026-02-03
Motion to extend the time to file a response from February 27, 2026 to March 30, 2026, submitted to The Clerk.
2026-01-23
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due February 27, 2026)
2025-12-19
Application (25A557) granted by The Chief Justice extending the time to file until January 23, 2026.
2025-12-15
Application (25A557) to extend further the time from December 26, 2025 to January 23, 2026, submitted to The Chief Justice.
2025-11-17
Application (25A557) granted by The Chief Justice extending the time to file until December 26, 2025.
2025-11-13
Application (25A557) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from November 26, 2025 to December 26, 2025, submitted to The Chief Justice.
Attorneys
Donte J. Carter
Shay Dvoretzky — Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP, Respondent
Shay Dvoretzky — Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP, Respondent
Shay Dvoretzky — Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP, Respondent
United States
D. John Sauer — Solicitor General, Petitioner
D. John Sauer — Solicitor General, Petitioner
D. John Sauer — Solicitor General, Petitioner