Whether the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit applied the wrong standard to the admission of perjured testimony that the government knew to be perjured

Whether the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit appli ed the wrong standard to the admission of perjured testimony that the government knew to be perjured, when it applied a “reasonable likelihood” standa rd instead of the “beyond a reasonable doubt” standard required by this Court in Glossip v. Oklahoma, 145 S. Ct. 612 (2025) .