Whether the court judgment could circumvent appellants' most important argument regarding Restatement 2nd, Special representative's fiduciary liability, and foreign law application in distribution

1. Whether the court judgment could circumvent appellants ’ most important argument: should this case adopt Restatement 2nd which is related to Special representative ’s fiduciary liability to other beneficiaries, litigant right of beneficiaries and different law application (foreign law) in distribution? 2. Whether Plaintiff was in her capacity to sign Settlement that stipulated distribution law? 3. Whether it could exclude the application of principles of Restatement 2nd if signed should it was signed? 4. Whether Mississippi Court of Appeal ’s ruling in Shortie vs George can be the guidance to this diversity case? 5. Whether the refusal to hold an evidentiary hearing violates Due Process law? 6. Whether not holding perjurer accountable violates the equal protection rights of law-abiding parties?