No. 25-934
Gore and Associates Management Company, Inc. v. SLSCO Ltd., et al.
Tags: 28-usc-1359 assignor-citizenship diversity-jurisdiction federal-court-procedure jurisdictional-dismissal subject-matter-jurisdiction
Latest Conference:
N/A
Question Presented (from Petition)
Whether a federal court may dismiss a diversity action, years after filing, for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction based solely on the plaintiff's inability to produce admissible evidence of the citizenship of nonparty assignors, absent any finding—or evidence—of a collusive or improper assignment under 28 U.S.C § 1359.
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether a federal court may dismiss a diversity action, years after filing, for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction based solely on the plaintiff's inability to produce admissible evidence of the citizenship of nonparty assignors, absent any finding—or evidence—of a collusive or improper assignment under 28 U.S.C § 1359
Docket Entries
2026-04-08
Brief of SLSCO Ltd., et al. in opposition submitted.
2026-04-08
Brief of respondents SLSCO Ltd., et al. in opposition filed.
2026-03-20
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including April 8, 2026.
2026-03-05
Motion to extend the time to file a response from March 9, 2026 to April 8, 2026, submitted to The Clerk.
2026-01-14
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due March 9, 2026)
Attorneys
Gore and Associations Management Company, Inc.
Anna Dorkas Torres — Wolfe Pincavage, Petitioner
SLSCO Ltd., et al.
Salvador J. Antonetti-Stutts — O'Neil & Borges, LLC, Respondent