No. 25-938
James Garfield Broadnax v. Texas
Tags: batson-violation constitutional-law equal-protection jury-selection peremptory-strikes race-discrimination
Key Terms:
DueProcess Punishment HabeasCorpus
DueProcess Punishment HabeasCorpus
Latest Conference:
N/A
Related Cases:
25-939
(Vide)
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the State's consideration of race in striking prospective Black jurors violated the Equal Protection Clause under Batson v. Kentucky
Question Presented (from Petition)
Whether the State’s considering race as a basis for striking prospective jurors, shown by its listing prospective jurors by race on a spreadsheet used during jury selection, and now confirmed by newly disclosed evidence of similar notations on a chart used during jury selection at Petitioner’s co -defendant’s trial, and by newly obtained affidavits from three struck prospective Black jurors , violated the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment under Batson v. Kentucky , 476 U.S. 79 (1986). (II)
Docket Entries
2026-02-04
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due March 9, 2026)
2026-02-04
Application (25A899) for a stay of execution of sentence of death, submitted to Justice Alito.
Attorneys
James Garfield Broadnax