Whether the Florida Supreme Court's decision warrants review by the U.S. Supreme Court given the pro se petitioner's claims of ineffective assistance of counsel and procedural complexities
No question identified. : N\ Of [(O FILE PETITION FOR WRit oO Comes Now, Petitioner, Mark lt. Wilson, PROCEEAING PAO SE, and AESPECKUIIY REQUEST ar EXIENSION OF ONE nbsguiee Biqhtu alesis (190) to FILE A PEttON For Watt oF CERTORARI. THE decision from the Florida Supreme Court CaS@ No, Sc 2023-0320 Was issued on MAY 224 2025. The current deadline to File the ectrron is fu + 90" 202.5 : Reasons For Reeurst () TAM & REPRESENTING MYSELF In this cAse/ Writ of CERTIORARI ANd AM Not A [EGA\ PRoFessional. (2) The [egal ssves ANd Court RECoRdS IN this CASE. ARE COMPLEX, REQUIRING MORE ME +o theroughly prepare the petchon. 6) Due +o the Fact thet Ihave Made. NUMEROUS attemets to the Public Defenders OF fice to File this PetttHon on Ay Behalf Knowing these Are time. Sensitive Matters, Counsel has Neclected to FUE PROPER PAPER Work on MY behalf) even AFTER T.'VE. EXPRESSEA MY CONCERNS About the desde to File this petrton, as well AS ave deep INtEaEst IN FILING this Petition, (rag 2 ocB) Therefore, Task this court +o grant ME AN EXtENSION OF IBODANS From the CURRENT AUE dete papa to PREPARE ANd cile MY Petron for Wartof Ceatiorarl Ped Se. OATH L, the petthoner described Here, Mark H. Wilson, UNdER FENALHES of PeAduRY, dECIARE that 1 have =a thE FOREGOING MOON And the pacts sty E. Mark (t. Wilsers Ths OATH (s Considered folly swogn And valid wethoot the Need for ay actual notaey. See Theoc. \. SUHE, 832 Se. 2d. 26l CELA, SUATG 42... 5ZS@)). Cerhrioste of Spevice L, Mae Ht. Weson, do hereby carte thet a true And, coppect copy of the egping Mastion foe EXtENSICA of time has been fuanshed to; State Attorney's Office, foe the Sevexth doclicial Circuct, Putwam Count. (114 E. Moody Blvd. Bldg, 4 F13, Bunnell, FA. S2il0-s9%l, on this 4 DAY oF St 2025, by US. MAIL. By it . Wilsons bc# GI99ZH DiidbN C. P.0. BOX [00D Baiford FL. 2083, (Pree 3 oF 5)