No. 25A217

Geronimo Velasco v. United States District Court for the Northern District of California, et al.

Lower Court: Ninth Circuit
Docketed: 2025-08-22
Status: Presumed Complete
Type: A
Tags: court-integrity due-process federal-rules judicial-estoppel phantom-hearing sanctions
Key Terms:
DueProcess EmploymentDiscrimina Privacy ClassAction
Latest Conference: N/A
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether a federal district judge may commit judicial estoppel by issuing contradictory orders and imposing sanctions based on a legally non-existent 'phantom hearing' that violates due process protections

Question Presented (from Petition)

No question identified. : No. In The SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES GERONIMO VELASCO, Applicant, Vv. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA; UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT, Respondents; PENTAGON TECHNOLOGIES GROUP, INC., Real Party in Interest. EMERGENCY APPLICATION FOR STAY OF DISTRICT COURT PROCEEDINGS UNDER RULE 23 AND THE ALL WRITS ACT TO THE HONORABLE ELENA KAGAN, CIRCUIT JUSTICE FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT Respectfully submitted, Geronimo Velasco Pro Se Applicant 23480 Nevada Road Hayward, California 94541 (510) 399-8028 monongiko@aol.com

Docket Entries

2025-08-25
Application (25A217) denied by Justice Kagan.
2025-07-29
Application (25A217) for a stay, submitted to Justice Kagan.

Attorneys

Geronimo Velasco
Geronimo Velasco — Petitioner
Geronimo Velasco — Petitioner
USDC ND CA, et al.
D. John SauerSolicitor General, Respondent
D. John SauerSolicitor General, Respondent