C. Holmes v. Granuaile, LLC, et al.
Whether a district court's dismissal of a civil action as barred by res judicata can be challenged when the plaintiff alleges exceptional circumstances warranting reconsideration
No question identified. : The petitioner respectfully motions for enlargement of time to file Petition for a Writ of Certiorari. ‘The petitioner respectfully requests a sixty (60) day extension from date of resolution in order to provide adequate time to attend to pressing matters and to comply regarding matters of great public importance, matters akin to mode of trial, matters capable of repetition, matters capable of evading review, and matters incapable of vindication after-the-fact. For substantial justice affecting substantial rights, the petitioner requests this Court grant this application for enlargement of time. Respectfully submitted, Dated 8L2f 25 ie ~Holines PO Box iS) , Sullivans Island/ SC 29482 843.883.3010 No. 24-1868 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES USDC-SC 2:20-cv-01748 C, Holmes, M.D., Petitioner, wv Granuaile, LLG, et al, Respondents. CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE Thereby certify that defendants have not been brought into the case and the record reflects there is no opposing counsel of record. All parties required to be served have been served. Dated _ B /78 fis wo C/Holme PO Box 187 — Sullivans Island, SC 29482 843.883.3010 USCA4 Appeal: 24-1868 Doc: 19 Filed: 03/13/2025 Pg: 1 of 2 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 24-1868 C. HOLMES, a/k/a Cynthia Holmes, a/k/a Cynthia Collie Holmes, Plaintiff Appellant, v. GRANUAILE, LLC; J. P. WALSH, individually and as related to Granuaile, LLC; L. WALSH, individually and as related to Granuaile, LLC, Defendants Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Charleston. Richard Mark Gergel, District Judge. (2:20-cv-01748-RMG) Submitted: March 11, 2025 Decided: March 13, 2025 Before NIEMEYER, RICHARDSON, and BENJAMIN, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. C. Holmes, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. USCA4 Appeal: 24-1868 Doc: 19 Filed: 03/13/2025 Pg: 2o0f2 PER CURIAM: C. Holmes appeals the district court’s orders denying her motions for recusal, accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and dismissing her civil action as barred by res judicata, and denying her motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s orders. Holmes v. Granuaile, LLC, No. 2:20-cv-01748-RMG (D.S.C. Aug. 8, 2024; Aug. 21, 2024; Sept. 4, 2024). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED USCA4 Appeal: 24-1868 Doc: 25 Filed: 04/29/2025 Pg: 1 of 1 FILED: April 29, 2025 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 24-1868 (2:20-cv-01748-RMG) C. HOLMES, a/k/a Cynthia Holmes, a/k/a Cynthia Collie Holmes Plaintiff Appellant v. GRANUAILE, LLC; J. P. WALSH, individually and as related to Granuaile, LLC; L. WALSH, individually and as related to Granuaile, LLC Defendants Appellees ORDER The court denies the petitions for rehearing and the motion to exceed the length limitation. Entered at the direction of the panel: Judge Niemeyer, Judge Richardson, and Judge Benjamin. For the Court /s/ Nwamaka Anowi, Clerk