Whether a pro se litigant's request for a 60-day extension to file a petition for writ of certiorari should be granted based on the complexity of the underlying legal matter and pending related cases

No question identified. : I am requesting a 60-day extention of time from Friday August 22, 2025, which is the Date I learned of the August 14 2025 letter concerning my qualifying Writ of Certiorari, asking to also include the lower court’s opinion. Judgments, AFFIRMED WITHOUT OPINION FILED in-person before Mooney, Presiding Judge, Pagan, Judge, and Hadlock, Senior Judge filed ON: July 03, 2024, and the ORDER DENYING RECONCIDERATION FILED ON: on 8/12/2024 from THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF OREGON, that was signed by Josephine H. Mooney Presiding Judge: order and opinion are attached. And, the final judgment, ORDER DENYING RECONCIDERATION from THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF OREGON, that was signed by Meagan A. Flynn Chief Justice: on MAY 15, 2025 is also attached. An extention of time is necessary due to the complexity of this matter, also there are other related cases in the Oregon Courts under review and set for ORAL ARGUMENT for October 15, 2025; therefore, additional time is necessary to argue and further research this matter, too present with all the facts with more clarity. The date for which this Petition for Writ of Certiorari expired was August 13, 2024; this is my first request for a 60-day extention of time from the new date of August 22, 2025 which is when I received notice back to attach the lower court’s order/opinion. This Application for WRIT OF CERTIORART is in good faith. The new filing dated would then be October 21, 2024. Attached are the final OPINIONS & ORDERS from the Court of Appeals of the State of Oregon, and the Supreme Court of the State of Oregon as requested. brentevan wkboite cola ENTE VAN WEPSTEQ August 26, 2025 brent evan webster dba BRENT EVAN WEBSTER 2 Application for 60-Day Extension of Time to File a Petition for Writ of Certiorari 8-26-2025 Certificate of Service I brent evan webster dba BRENT EVAN WEBSTER certify that a copy of this Application for a 60-day Extension of Time to File a Petition for a Writ of Certiorari was served by US mail, and E-mail, on Mathew Lauritsen within 3-business days. brevdemauslitrda Bent SUAN WEBSTER August 26, 2025 brent evan webster dba BRENT EVAN WEBSTER Redwood Holdings LLC dba Wedgewood Inc. e/o KELL, ALTERMAN & RUNSTEIN, L.L.P. Mathew W. Lauritsen, OSB No. 083949 520 SW Yamhill St., Suite 600 Portland, Oregon 97204-1329 Email: Telephone: (503) 222-3531 Attorneys for Respondents Please Mail Correspondence Brent Evan Webster c/o Brent Webster 8701 SE Cottrell Rd. 12210 SW Main St. #231192 Boring, OR 97009 Tigard, Oregon 97281 Telephone: (503) 933-2000 Email: 3 Application for 60-Day Extension of Time to File a Petition for Writ of Certiorari 8-26-2025 FILED: July 03, 2024 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF OREGON REDWOOD HOLDINGS, LLC, dba Wedgewood Inc., v. AZONIA HANEY and all other occu aus of 8707 SE 347th Ave., Boring, OR 97009, efendants, and BRENT EVAN WEBSTER, dba Brent Evan Webster, Clackamas County Circuit Court 23LT05881 A181376 Thomas J. Rastetter, Judge. Argued and submitted on June 14, 2024. Before Mooney, Presiding Judge, Pagan, Judge, and Hadlock, Senior Judge. Attorney for Appellant: | Brent Evan Webster pro se. Attorney for Respondent: Matthew W. Lauritsen. AFFIRMED WITHOUT OPINION DESIGNATION OF PREVAILING PARTY AND AWARD OF COSTS Prevailing party: § Respondent { ] Nocosts allowed. [X] Costs allowed, payable by Appellant. IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF OREGON REDWOOD HOLDINGS, LLC, dba Wedgewood Inc., Vv. AZONIA HANEY and all other occupants of 8707 SE 347th Ave., Boring, OR 97009, Defendants, and BRENT EVAN WEBSTER, dba Brent Evan Webster, Clackamas County Circuit Court No. 23LT05881 Court of Appeals No. A181376 ORDER DENYING RECONSIDERATION Appellant petitions for reconsideration of the court's decision dated July 3, 2024. The court has considered the petition and orders that the petition is denied. The petition for reconsideration is denied. 7 —— Tes Josephine H. Mooney Presiding Judge 8/12/2024 c: Ma