Michael Anthony Christopher Cochren, II v. White Castle System, Inc., et al.
Whether a pro se litigant's request for a one-day extension of time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari meets the legal standard for good cause under Supreme Court Rule 13.5
No question identified. : To the Honorable Brett M. Kavanaugh, as Circuit Justice for the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit: ~ Now comes pro se Michael Anthony Christopher Cochren IT, to-apply-for-an extension of time to file his petition for a-writ-of certiorari, —-—-— pursuant to SCOTUS Rule 13.5. Petitioner would like for his Thursday, October 9, 2025 deadline to be extended to Friday, October 10, 2025; it’s to secure the timeliness of his petition under 28 U.S. Code § 2101(c) and to, also, answer pursuant to SCOTUS Rule 13.3. I. JURISDICTION After the final decision of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri, in Cochren v. ite Castle System, Inc., et al., (E.D.Mo.)(2024), Petitioner went to the jurisdiction of the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit pursuant to 28 U.S. Code § 636(c)(3), 42 U.S. Code § 2000e-5(), 28 U.S. Code § 1291, and 28 U.S. Code § 1294(1). The date on which the eighth circuit court of appeals decided Case No. 25-1196 and summarily affirmed the lower court, without opinion, was May 14th, 2025. (see