Whether a state court's interpretation of a trust instrument that allegedly deprives a beneficiary of a life estate and right of occupancy violates due process or constitutes an improper taking of property rights

No question identified. : is a Saturday. Rule 30 says: The last day of the period shall be included, unless it is a Saturday, Sunday, federal legal holiday listed in 5 U.S.C. Section 6103, or day on which the Court building is closed by order of the Court or the Chief Justice, in which event the period shall extend until the end of the next day that is not a Saturday, Sunday, federal legal holiday, or day on which the Court building is closed. Unless an extension is granted, the deadline for filing the Writ of Certiorari will be October 14’2025. I, as applicant, have included a copy of the letter from the California Supreme Court saying Appellant’s Petition for Review is denied. See Exhibit A. The date of that letter is July 1672025. Hence why I have the above dates for my Extension of Time request. In support of this request, applicant states as follows: This court has jurisdiction to hear my case because the California Supreme Court denied my Petition for Review. The California Supreme Court denied Appellant’s Petition for Review, dated July 16’2025. Exhibit A. This Court has jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. Section 1257(a). The judgement to be reviewed is that the California Supreme Court denied my Petition for Review. Justice Kagan, first, after five years of this case, my health is suffering, this case has taken its toll on my health. It has been so unhealthy for me. I have health conditions that are Lifethreatening. Especially because of the dishonest people involved. I am so exhausted I can barely write. My eyes are so tired I can barely see. I need you to know that this case should never have been brought to court. The case was brought to court because certain dishonest, greedy, selfish people who didn’t want to honor what my mother wrote in her Will and Trust. Instead, my sister the Trustee, and the lawyer who drafted my mother’s final Trust, and the Trustee’s litigation lawyers, were very creative in the unlawful taking of my mother’s home-her property, and the money from the Trust. For reference, my mother and I have the same name-Patricia Cornell. I am Patricia M. Cornell; my mom is Patricia A. Cornell. My mom goes by Pat. I go by Tish. My mother died March 6’2020. My sister the Trustee is Ann Cornell. At times Ann may go by her married name: Ann Cornell Forthofer. My sister Kathleen Cornell goes by Casey. The lawyer who drafted my mom’s final Trust is Cynthia Trutner. The trustee’s litigation lawyers are Julia Butler, Robert Epstein, and Alex Johnson. In her Trust, my mother the Settlor, wrote a mandatory commandment with the use of the word: “Shall” of a Life Estate for me-Patricia Cornell, and Kathleen, and Ann-trustee. A part of the Trust for reference: Page 4, Article IV, Section C. “San Rafael Property. All of Settlor’s interest in the real property commonly known as 6 Madrona Street, San Rafael, California (“the Property”), and the sum of one hundred thousand dollars ($100,000) shall be held in a trust for the benefit of Settlor’s daughters: Patricia; Ann; and, Kathleen. The trustee shall allow any of the beneficiaries named in this Section C to reside in the property. . If no beneficiary chooses to live in the property,”. I won’t write the rest as that will be a part of my Writ of Certiorari. But after it says, “If no beneficiary chooses to live in the property,” it goes on to say what the trustee may do. Such as she could rent or sell the property. The last sentence where the trustee could sell the house is poorly drafted. But that did not take our rights away from a Life Estate and a Right to Occupy. However, that poor drafting was used by the trustee and her lawyers to deliberately misuse a few of the sentences in that provision regarding the Settlor’s property. This for their personal gain. Now you know that the case is about my mom’s Trust. The motive-the reason behind the crime, and tragedy, and which involves at least one Federal crime, the motive being Greed-the love of money, and want of property not