Whether a pro se litigant was denied due process and violated statutory provisions under the Texas Civil Practice & Remedies Code when sanctions were awarded without an Order to Show Cause

No question identified. : originating from the Trial Court Case Number: 141-348108-23 and disposed on 12/22/2023 at 141% State Judicial District Court in Tarrant County with violation of the due process and the statutory provision of the Texas Civil Practice & Remedies Code (TXCPRC) of the Chapter 10, Section 10.044(e) and for the rights that the litigant has to receive a Order to Show Cause and before any sanctions could be awarded in the civil case assigned and for suppose frivolous matter to opponent parties. 7, The Court of Appeals Second District of Texas at Fort Worth affirmed the dismissal of the civil case appeal as frivolous matter and with sanctions awarded and without have the litigant subject for sanctions not received and from the trial court at least one Order to Show Cause and before any sanctions could be awarded and not having the due process rights and still having the trial court violated the TKCPRC, Chapter 10, Section 10.004(e). 8. Applicant requires additional time to prepare a thorough petition due to the complexity of the constitutional issues and also about the procedural issues and that it involves the necessity to research about the due process for public access to the open courts, the probability of bias, conflict of interests and the appearance of impropriety and the need to compile, review, and cite the appellate record from both the 141st State Judicial District Court in Tarrant County and the Court of Appeals Second District of Texas at Fort Worth. Applicant is pro se as self-represented litigant. This extension will allow Applicant to present the issues most helpfully to the Court and to ensure full compliance with the Court’s rules. 9. Respondents have been contacted regarding this application. 10.This application is filed more than 29 days before the current deadline scheduled and to be on 10/16/2025 in compliance with Rule 13(5). 11.For the foregoing reasons, Applicant respectfully requests that an extension of 60 days to and including on 12/15/2025 be granted which Applicant may file a petition for a writ of certiorari with the United States Supreme Court. fp D Respectfully submitted, ~ 5 Zhe ~~ “/s/ Adriano Kruel Budri Adriano Kruel Budri (Pro Se), Applicant 5029 County Road 605 Burleson, TX 76028-1177 Phone (817) 447-3868 abudri64@gmail.com Dated: 09/16/2025 FILE COPY IN THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS NO. 25-0293 : Tarrant County, ADRIANO KRUEL BUDRI § aT he Vv. § GREG PATRICK MCALLISTER § 5 AND JEREMY W. HAWPE § a June 13, 2025 Petitioner's petition for review, filed herein in the above numbered and styled case, having been duly considered, is ordered, and hereby is, denied. July 18, 2025 Petitioner's motion for rehearing of petition for review, filed herein in the above numbered and styled case, having been duly considered, is ordered, and hereby is, denied, kkk k kkk kkk I, BLAKE A. HAWTHORNE, Clerk of the Supreme Court of Texas, do hereby certify that the above is a true and correct copy of the orders of the Supreme Court of Texas in the case numbered and styled as above, as the same appear of record in the minutes of said Court under the date shown. Tt is further ordered that petitioner, ADRIANO KRUEL BUDRI, pay all costs incurred on this petition. WITNESS my hand and seal of the Supreme Court of Texas, at the City of Austin, this the 18th day of July, 2025. Blake A. Hawthorne, Clerk By Monica Zamarripa, Deputy Clerk OFFICIAL NOTICE FROM > RPREN RE RE PES S n Eee ert US POSTAGE: ATEOF'TEXAS 3 fags SRB] Case Nas 25-0293 | FORA pie 09. 2A Dhope-cyz STYLE: BUDRI v. MCALLISTER © oH egies Ree ree $as Vas Oi deed 0008036029 JUN 13 2025 Today the Supreme Court of Texas denied the petition for review in the above-referenced case. The Motion for Temporary Relief and Stay, ag amended, is dismissed as moot. a MAILTO: ADRIANO KRUEL BUDRI 5029 COUNTY ROAD 605 BURLESON, TX 76028-1177 = 02 71 LLISTER ; FOR PRIVATE USE ae 2° 747°" $ 000.6 Today the Supreme Court of Texas denied t88 Moti dh Pat reheari