Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether a corporate subsidiary's Rule 29.6 disclosure statement satisfies Supreme Court procedural requirements for corporate ownership transparency
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
No question identified. : Additional Counsel: BRIAN C. ROCCA SUJAL J. SHAH MICHELLE PARK CHIU LEIGHA BECKMAN MorGan, LEwIs & Bocktus LLP One Market, Spear Street Tower San Francisco, CA 94105 (415) 442-1000 JONATHAN I. KRAVIS MUNGER, TOLLES & OLSON LLP 601 Massachusetts Avenue NW Suite 500E Washington, D.C. 20001 (202) 220-1100 GLENN D. POMERANTZ KURUVILLA OLASA MUNGER, TOLLES & OLSON LLP 350 South Grand Avenue Fiftieth Floor Los Angeles, California 90071 (213) 683-9100 JUSTIN P. RAPHAEL DANE P. SHIKMAN MUNGER, TOLLES & OLSON LLP 560 Mission Street Twenty Seventh Floor San Francisco, California 94105 (415) 512-4000 Counsel for Applicants
2025-10-06
Application (25A354) referred to the Court.
2025-10-06
Application (25A354) for partial stay presented to Justice Kagan and by her referred to the Court is denied.
2025-10-03
Amicus brief of The International Center for Law & Economics submitted.
2025-10-03
Response to application from respondent Epic Games, Inc. filed.
2025-10-03
Brief amicus curiae of The International Center for Law & Economics filed.
2025-10-02
Amicus brief of The Committee for Justice submitted.
2025-10-02
Brief amicus curiae of Committee for Justice filed.
2025-10-01
Amicus brief of ACT | The App Association submitted.
2025-10-01
Brief amici curiae of Former National Security Officials and Scholars filed.
2025-10-01
Brief amicus curiae of ACT | The App Association filed.
2025-09-26
Response to application (25A354) requested by Justice Kagan, due by 4 p.m. (EDT), on October 3, 2025.
2025-09-24
Application (25A354) for a partial stay, submitted to Justice Kagan.