No. 25A397

Obe E. Johnson v. Harry Feliciano-Maldonado, et al.

Lower Court: First Circuit
Docketed: 2025-10-07
Status: Presumed Complete
Type: A
Tags: constitutional-claim due-process evidentiary-hearing ineffective-assistance sixth-amendment state-court-proceedings
Latest Conference: N/A
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether a state court's failure to provide an evidentiary hearing on a potentially meritorious constitutional claim constitutes a violation of due process under the Sixth Amendment

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

No question identified. : [eae ne IS —IJIoelo a fensprnncy Commenced frmene Cy COommpoW eal. of YPQuecfto FICO (Repest Cast of Dastice Federal Dudges Actorcec PresecuTon, Aen f OaS ih beat Pusdice To Hele | (ogee mwi& 7p © +p -of4 Foe ceeu,-: mel Ca FE 712 Jod§es thet is reasonable bill jez. taVvelveded Wits, Ee Spir aly AO ME A664 oy Se | 24 OFbE— yOcuf a rE dee sda, fo maida ae CERf Lica te of Lichter Con gol e peed TO Obfe i Meledbe Foon, jie | |e OIE —P+fe, | tos 7 rent ae are — ; f4e v2. TO PLO Sse nel) CY Ideoce phert WAS 't Hpeeres -4 a, _Stat€S Coeur CaSeE f if Fede-al Cocust ben! ng 44 4HACEdIS Clatin 6S Iingit \Ed to bos. G@)+--= Faces af S (PLESEn AE oes Ot ; State COtLe O+.9 OBE ine 2 eo (6) toe Jachua | Fe od ings oF tee Stat& Couce This v8 tue deJeu pt Fenle (CEmenger tice 14 Atmaest 44 Cre tumstunce _ geet Clairas must hove Firge bees, heard Sy r SAGFE Coeut before Go Cats bal BE Ab Eten Hs ey (pee COX Piis, Pek gy: oO, F Yeu bout 40 Expy — FLEE Ector 7 hecau ce @ a eF (nes CY dence you Shouid até myer. op. de S@ tH State Cot First Even if Gow Clr26e fete pdace tue Hew EV dence in State Comet _ dais Wil Sted Help you bOuE+, ht yt ee. Ap ¢evte oO [Aecor ca 1 FeEde-4f Coes Jor Gerte babes | PRE4LEA LH Of, ia ——==* — a bt dd —d Mee Faule rele ete, S thee Genet “14 Speck me levidence eu Or Youre Cou Set did upt Subinit fi Mitre og Hae 8 Sta te proceed ia so Cleon Ot DE | Cons. deced sy +6€ fede-al Cou-t, t+€ federal _ (Couse is atSo net allptoed to +everse Fuctug) Ponds a by toe Slate Cott ueless You Can rebut —_ Coreet¢uess of fue State Coent’S Conclusion _ by elec od COON eine 6 dente, You min al §o on gue there the State Coure 3 dec’Sie, u9as Urea | Se5able fr a ep tue EV idence Pr-edented, 2 tr R 7 VF s R ty % t fh y 7 5 ™ »s r 5 3 J Generang, You Cas only estab) St nels Faets (Oj ee foe 6S HEU CVifec€E 46€ deFuu lé rules _ 4 Subject +o narreutad -ar.Ee EXCepsons dis Cussed in tars Seetive of tHe module Wren Facts Gre to disput Ee you mney be Eu ti He +o. pin (Ev idewpiaeg beacing) ob tn ecb $e Th EXp~_ land +56 +ecocd +0 resolve toat dispute iF; | & Oo) ef Co-cect~ess by Cleae and Corvingin @| Eto apepliCanw has Fealed to deNelep tue Factual jlbasis efa claihn in State Court Proceed ing s Woe Come Statl net held an ev-de+ 4 ae G MEA ing peat aS Se even aqtte-“4 poe State S Facttrat afl mn oo 2 mn Mee bite PUD Cle lurimsfantes Fou fine imegt PanT fils Set of rules ss Set oT j4y OT US. -IASV~) a — na haebas Corpus Proceeding — Gq dates nna ton lef Gg Factual issue made by a State Court Shag/ $e poe sumed +o be Comede H4E GpPli tanec Shall _ | haere PoE buides of r&buté: a toe PreSumetio coaidencm _ Neder Pe Clas +eles O4 _ = OA Nek HuleE of Coos fei pra) lab) made retro — Gs oo ttiven OD a ee a Ca Feccfiragt Predicate that coutd net hove been — pte ste siiss Sy clea and Cony, nei na es ac at Lot Foo Consd tutional Errby, no 6ea Fon ——— CLO sly discove-ed through foe execs Se ls a eh tue Ae Li gence aud CB) et ie Facks taenlere LG) G chteme Cla: by bIoctd be sugpee ce (eg | exvide. (a 44 She FoctjFr onder woud have Found toe agplicast Guilty of tue tun declying © Ffe. SE _ _ a Gueat vn oF Fact Whicu, 7 ee TO Sturmimanite (4 Crcde. fp +eteive An evident any _ = hg ss. aed Fo Stow #Fhot A6EE CS He t# & Claim, noas not deveteed to State Course SOC ange oF toe (PEA (Ale se Ss eveoe (enn pe by abpous.. and fou your Attorn €orneg) you erie SPOT oe Ent HlEA_ [7 ten SVIMNE bios g hbaring (2 You ¢ An dE rvnsts ate _ phat foee ls 4 Que Shien ef Taee and you Cas, demen ste ate bot. @) Can$e and ‘nnccence ee O | Worerrs ted: PT en eee types veces, & guestien, of ~~ Face aud a gest’ eon ef Ca, Z ee yeu ed a Ontg EVE E+. 4. we to An Ev: deonshe a =4 ee preeie =n WEN fu eee @s & despuse Aateut G a Question, of Face A Fu shia oF Faet means trot Gou and Ae Stadt di se, G-€e Wout Nhat | Seteealls naprened A Juesties F baw 645 Hoe | Oto ee hand 9 Bens thee You and tue Shade SE | AG ee thee CVE xe. Y. Jf Cc belt ed but gee ae Saq-

Docket Entries

2025-10-07
Application (25A397) denied by Justice Jackson.
2025-09-18
Application (25A397) for a certificate of appealability, submitted to Justice Jackson.

Attorneys

Obe Johnson
Obe E. Johnson — Petitioner