James Saylor v. Rob Jeffreys, Director, Nebraska Department of Correctional Services
Whether res judicata precludes a prisoner with serious mental illness from bringing a new lawsuit challenging prolonged solitary confinement based on newly developed facts not available in a prior dismissed action
No question identified. : | and Cireyit wWustice Br the Bighth Gircuit * Pursuant +o 3a@u.s. Cc. g Alollce) and Supreme. Court Rule $3.5, Petitioner James Say lov ; a State prisoner Pm Nebvas ko, pre Caed ing pr se; bespectPolly preys Pow a \ Pett loner apologizes Bor Submitting a Wand written Application. However) there Was he other option lbeeause prison oPPicials in Nebraska deny aecess +o ty pewrirers | even For decuments do be Filed of a Cove Kven “thous ly Petitioner fs not Proceeding in Pema pauperis; Pelitiomer~ bespect Polly requests Het the belevact provisions of this Court's Rule 39.3 be applied heve So thet PeHHemer's hemehWw tren, Application may be Biled, Petittoner also vespeetfully points cut thet Supreme Court Rule 33.a oloes Yet expressly require Hot clocuments be +ypewrrten: a 60-day extension of +ime; +o and Eivelicctiegs December J1, Qoas , to Pile his petitton Rr CertHorant in this Court. The Eighth Circurtr ewtered judamerct on March 194 3025, App. a then demied rehearing on uly 3a, 9025; App. to, Gch “Petitimen's sme do Pelion for certoras expires on Velober 30, A085, Tis Application is a Prled More Hen |o days before Het date. Judgment, Opinion , ard Rehesring Order Copies of the Eighth Circuth's _jusgine Opivion ; auch rehearing oder ave atycheal Weveto at App. a) App. 31 ewl Appr 10, resp ectively : durisdietion The jurisdicHon oR this Court do review on Cerhorari ~he judg ment in +his Case is invoked under a8 WS & jasd(i). Nature of Case This Case fnvelves a prisomer with mental Ines, lemg~ tern solituny CmPinement , anak bes judicata» In 2080, Petittonen brew ht surt alleging Het yp with mly @ Cuwple |ekcewhions , “Who Respurclowt heel held chim in Solitary ComPinemant Since AGA beeamse he has Post ~ Hravincstic Sthess Aisord ex (P45 D) I if +hus Violating the Americans wrth Disabilities Act a 3 CADA) eve the Rehabr'| echion Aetof [173 CRA). However; +he Courts below Weld thee Such wag ‘ ‘ ‘ cc res edicata becuse % Cw Previens Suit 7 Saylor TZ -awd ismissed. Whether the @uvrenmt sutt ts pes judicata turns om Whether lew ficks ther Aid not de Velop uret | toma, ak-ey~ Say bow hock been dismissed give ise +o co new Claim. 4Y2uUs.0. 8 jQi3BllajyBa. aqus.c. 8 79H). The new Packs Include dhe Rllowiney | he Res puwclentk velecred Petitioner Prem Soli Feany Copinemac 5 Upon releasing RekiHomer~ | Re Petiioney~ fer his disability PasD 1 thus riding re possible Ro~ Petri dt me to Nive outside Selithucy Camfyiine mont 5 however | in dol ¢ 1h yeers of rer velensine Pedi Hone | Foyv— Ke apparerk reason Respuclewk rescinded Pekituner's accemmodettens aml threw Petitiene back into Solitary Combine ment Even Hugh the dold “rescission Packs ” Aid wa develop uwtl epperimetely a year after Saylor = had loeen dlismissecl , he Eighth Circuits held thet such diel not produce aA wWew clafm . App. 7.7 The Following ave a Pav of, the veasons Why His Case fs “cert worthy * a. Cmbtict between the Cireutts, Pursuent sho Supreme Court Rule 1o@\ ; he cleeatsion by i. (a) A key as peck A the Et yb Civcust's olecasio is Wek He Vveseissio Picks clo not prockuce Q New Clam beceme t+'s Supposedly “ lear al ” eo hei Peditiemer in Solitcry Cunfinemoct becouse he Was Prsd. App: 7) Such weeds do loa. explainect in He peatten Por Cerdlareni 5 (b) Pleene see Ape: Rar the Bighth Cirneutt's Finding s Concerning Wwhek he S018 beselssin Rots ave, The Eighth Cineuts Firching s re gevehing Such are naccurete emel Selective. ~The Count Railed de ibeveHy Qastve Petitioner's pre se Complaint, at the ig bth Circuit in His Case Cmblicts with A “vrebust Comsensus ° Cases b persuasive author My ? Bama the Third amcl Fourth Circuits on the lew Putwess 4 Solitery Cunpine monk . Ege | Williams Vi See'y Pa Dep't of Covr.; ly R4th 503, 524 Calso Stv-a4) (3rd Ci dead ) Cextersing to clecth vow inmates “S clearly establis heck right” of indi Vitcuals with preexisting Serious modk illness het to be Sub) ected to prolged sali Qunfyi homenst with ~ Cruc