No. 25A440
Meelad Dezfooli v. United States
Tags: counsel-of-choice criminal-procedure due-process ineffective-assistance right-to-counsel sixth-amendment
Key Terms:
DueProcess
DueProcess
Latest Conference:
2025-12-05
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the Sixth Amendment permits the denial of counsel of choice and the complete abandonment by appointed counsel constituting a violation of a criminal defendant's right to effective representation
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
No question identified. :
Docket Entries
2025-12-08
Application (25A440) denied by the Court.
2025-11-12
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 12/5/2025.
2025-11-12
Application (25A440) referred to the Court.
2025-10-28
Application (25A440) refiled and submitted to Justice Sotomayor.
2025-10-17
Application (25A440) denied by Justice Kagan.
2025-10-11
Application (25A440) for bail, submitted to Justice Kagan.
Attorneys
Meelad Dezfooli
Meelad Dezfooli — Petitioner
United States
D. John Sauer — Solicitor General, Respondent