CashCall, Inc., et al. v. Consumer Financial Protection Bureau
This is an application for an extension of time to file a petition for certiorari, not a petition for certiorari itself. The document does not contain a "Question(s) Presented" section in the traditional sense.
However, the application does articulate the legal issues that Applicants intend to raise in their forthcoming petition. Based on the content of the application, the questions presented would be:
Whether the Ninth Circuit erred in holding that restitution at law is an equitable remedy for Seventh Amendment purposes, contrary to this Court's decisions in Great-West Life & Annuity Insurance Co. v. Knudson, Liu v. SEC, and Jarkesy.
Whether Applicants waived their Seventh Amendment right to a jury trial when assertion of that right was foreclosed by binding circuit precedent at the time of the initial district court proceedings.
**Note:** These are derived from the application's discussion of intended arguments, not from an actual "Question(s) Presented" section, as this document is an extension request rather than a filed petition for certiorari.
Whether the Seventh Amendment requires a jury trial for legal restitution claims that exceed a defendant's net profits, notwithstanding the Ninth Circuit's precedent in Commerce Planet