Whether the Florida Supreme Court improperly dismissed a mandatory jurisdiction review petition without providing substantive explanation, potentially violating due process and appellate review standards

No question identified. : Notice of Mandatory review due to invalid or unconstitutional statute. The Florida Supreme Courts made several errors in the proceedings, such as but not limited to, placing the case in the wrong case type. It took 30 days for these parties to speak with the clerk, dispute the errors, and even had to speak with the Staff Attorney about these harmful errors, presenting case law about these errors, in which a corrected order was issued, and the record had to be fixed. These parties are also dealing with several health issues, hospital visits due to a current pregnancy, while combating injustice before these courts. Two of the few issues we intend to bring before these courts is whether the ALJ, First DCA of Florida, & the Florida Supreme Courts had proper jurisdiction in the NICA proceedings and secondly, whether it was a civil, constitutional, & federal violation for the court system to intentionally exclude evidence & facts, and rule with fraudulent evidence. (These parties obtained sworn affidavits that some of the consent forms are forged, the ALJ intentionally excluded this information and testimony that there wasn’t consent for procedures, and ruled there was consent & a signature despite sworn affidavits from two fraud experts, and two physicians who have examined the records and wrote opinions.) CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of the above and foregoing has been filed through the Florida Court’s E-Portal this 9th day of July, 2025, and furnished electronically to: Mindy McLaughlin, Esq., Carissa W. Brumby, Esq., Beytin, Mclaughlin, Mclaughlin,O’Hara & Bocchino, P.A., 1706 East Eleventh Avenue, Tampa, FL 33605, lawfla@outlook.com, and Dinah S. Stein, Esq., Hicks, Porter, Ebenfeld & Stein, PA., 799 Brickell Plaza, 9th Floor, Miami, Florida 33131, Counsel for Baycare 3 Health Systems, Inc. d/b/a St. Joseph’s Hospital, Inc. d/b/a St. Joseph’s Women’s Hospital, Pamela Taylor, R.N. and Sandra Valiquette, R.N., Alyssa M. Reiter, Esq., Nichole M. Koford, Esq., Wicker, Smith, O’Hara, McCoy & Ford, P.A., 100 S. Ashley Drive, Suite #1800, Tampa, FL 33602, Jason M. Azzarone, Esquire, Louis J. La Cava, Esq., La Cava Jacobson & Goodies, P.A., 501 E. Kennedy Blvd., Suite 1250, Tampa, FL 33602, , Counsel for Jill L. Hetchman, M.D., Gina Washington, M.D., Sobiah Mallick, M.D., Tampa Obstetrics, PA. and Exodus Women’s Center, Inc.A copy of this motion is being mailed to Supreme Court of the United States 1 First Street, NE Washington, DC 20543 Sandra A. Zikry Cell: (813)-203-3879 Email: Address: 11248 PADDOCK MANOR AVE, RIVERVIEW FL 33569 Supreme Court of Florida TUESDAY, APRIL 22, 2025 CORRECTED ORDER! Sandra Zikry and Jamel SC2025-0562 Danielson behalf of and as Lower Tribunal No(s).: parents and natural 1D2023-0997; guardians of N.D., a minor, Petitioner(s) v. Florida Birth-Related Neurological Injury Compensation Association, St. Joseph's Women's Hospital, Jill Hechtman, M.D., Gina Washington, M.D., and Sobiah Mallick, M.D., Respondent(s) Petitioner’s “Notice of Mandatory Jurisdiction," seeking review of the order or opinion issued by the 1st District Court of Appeal on January 29, 2025, is hereby dismissed. This Court lacks jurisdiction to review an unelaborated decision from a district court of appeal that is issued without opinion or explanation or that merely cites to an authority that is not a case pending review in, or reversed or quashed by, this Court. See Wheeler v. State, 296 So. 3d 895 (Fla. 2020); Wells v. State, 132 So. 3d 1110 (Fla. 2014); Jackson v. State, 926 So. 2d 1262 (Fla. 2006); Gandy v. State, 846 1 Corrected Petitioner’s title of filing from “Petitioner's Notice to Invoke Discretionary Jurisdiction” to Petitioner’s “Notice of Mandatory Jurisdiction” on May 20, 2025. CASE NO.: SC2025-0562 Page Two So. 2d 1141 (Fla. 2003); Stallworth v. Moore, 827 So. 2d 974 (Fla. 2002); Harrison v. Hyster Co., 515 So. 2d 1279 (Fla. 1987); Dodi Publ’g Co. v.