No. 25A470

Chase Hunter v. Joanne Auclair

Lower Court: Massachusetts
Docketed: 2025-10-24
Status: Application
Type: A
Tags: appellate-review constitutional-question due-process extraordinary-circumstances pro-se-litigation state-court
Latest Conference: N/A
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether a state court's denial of a pro se litigant's application for further appellate review, coupled with alleged procedural irregularities and potential due process violations, warrants extraordinary Supreme Court intervention

Question Presented (from Petition)

No question identified. : Ct.R. 13.5 establishes a maximum 60-day extension. But this is an extraordinary situation, JURISDICTION 2. On October 16, 2025, the Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts denied Ms, Hunter’s timely motion for reconsideration, (Attachment A at Bates 19,) Sh Ms. Hunter has ninety days from that date to file a petition for a writ of certiorari, Sup. Ct. R, 13.3, Therefore, unless extended, the petition is due by January 15, 2026. Today’s date is October 19, 2025, 4, Jurisdiction is established by 28 U.S.c, $ 1257, JUDGMENT sSouGHT TO BE REVIEWED Dr, A copy of the two denials of Ms. Hunter’s two Applications to the Supreme Judicial Court (the top state court) for Further Appellate Review are in Attachment a at Bates 17-18. These denials relate to Applications for Further Appellate Review #30243 (filed 3/17/25 (due by 3/20/25); denied 4/17/25) and #30243B (filed 6/12/25 (due by 6/12/25); denied 7/25/25), 6. A copy of the denial of Ms. Hunter’s motion for reconsideration of the denial of Application for Further Appellate Review #30243B is attached (filed 8/8/25 (due by 8/8/25); Denied 10/16/25) (Attachment a at Bates 19). Page 2 of 15 Bates Page 2 of 43 7. A copy of the Massachusetts Appeals Court (the intermediate state appellate court) Panel Appeal 2023-P-1503 Opinion dated February 27, 2025 (dismissal), that relates to Application for Further Appellate Review 30243 is Attachment B at Bates 20-23. (extension to file motion for reconsideration allowed through 4/14/25 and timely filed on 4/14/25; denied on 4/15/25). 8. A copy of the Massachusetts Appeals Court Panel Appeal 2023P-1503 Opinion dated May 22, 2025 (awarding $30,044 in sanctions), that relates to Application for Further Appellate Review 30243B is Attachment C at Bates 24-27. SPECIFIC REASONS WHY AN EXTENSION IS JUSTIFIED Preliminary 9, Ms. Hunter is not an attorney and does not have support staff to assist with researching and drafting and needs extra time to give this Court her best effort. a The impending petition will not ask this Court to correct factual errors; will raise one or two constitutional questions; will show a “Circuit split”, will reveal state-by-state inconsistencies on these questions, and/or will establish that a federal question was decided in a way that conflicts with this Court’s past decisions. 10. Ms. Hunter is indigent but will pay the filing fee of $300 and will print the perfect-bound booklets herself because the Page 3 of 15 Bates Page 3 of 43 cost to professionally print the booklets is cost-prohibitive. Extraordinary Circumstances Justify This Request 11. Ms. Hunter has many pending appeals and lawsuits in the Commonwealth of Massachusetts, and she needs an extension so that she can give each court her best effort. a The substance of the impending petition is not based on these pending appeals and lawsuits and not based on the substance of this Application. But this is relevant to show that this Application is justified. 12. Truth is stranger than fiction, Justice Jackson. The truth is that there is a Massachusetts attorney, Susan McCoy, who has been committing crimes against Ms. Hunter since at least September 2024, This is explained, in part, in United States District Court case 3:25-cv-30143; Springfield, Massachusetts, Chase Hunter v. Susan McCoy, et al. It has been very timeconsuming, mentally distracting, and physically demanding for Ms. Hunter to try to avoid and try to recover from Ms. McCoy’s crimes. And such crimes are unpredictable. Ms. Hunter was forced to rent a private storage unit just to keep court documents and evidence safe because Ms. Hunter cannot keep them in her home because Ms. McCoy illegally locked Ms. Hunter out of her home three times from October 2024 to July 11, 2025. After each illegal lock-out, Ms. Hunter regained access to her home using her own means. On July 23, 2025, Ms. Hunter's security camera recorded Ms. McCoy telling a strange man to illegally lockout Page 4 of 15 Bates Pag

Docket Entries

2025-10-27
Application (25A470) granted by Justice Jackson extending the time to file until March 15, 2026.
2025-10-20
Application (25A470) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from January 14, 2026 to March 15, 2026, submitted to Justice Jackson.

Attorneys

Chase Hunter
Chase Hunter — Petitioner
Chase Hunter — Petitioner