Frederick S. Koger v. Charles E. Kleidon, et al.
Whether a pro se litigant's in forma pauperis petition can be denied without a detailed explanation of the grounds for denial
No question identified. : PROFF OF SERVICE No: 24-7519 In The Supreme Court of the United States | Frederick S. Koger, pro se, do swear that on this date, October 19, 2005, | alerted Attorney Ethan Merel, a denial of my petition to to proceed in forma pauperis. TO: Ethan Merel Assistant Corporate Counsel 2 North LsSalle Street, Suite 550 Chicago, lilinois 60602 | declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct AN Lyd Mega Frederick S. Koger Pro Se 8345 South Ashland Avenue #208945 Chicago, Illinois 60620 (773) 577-0322 Executed on October 19, 2025