Whether a pro se prisoner's motion for an extension of time to file a writ of certiorari should be granted due to limited access to legal resources

No question identified. : Available to petitioner are antiquated typewriters and other extinct equipment. In good faith, petitioner would not be able to meet the statute of limitation of October 27, 2025 in order to complete and file the application for a writ of certs ws.! lorari. For the foregoing reasons it is submitted that the requested extension, to an including October 27, 2025, should be granted. I DECLARE UNDER PENALTY OF PERJURY THAT: I AM THE PETITIONER, :: NICHOLAS HANSEN, I HAVE READ THE ABOVE AND THE INFORMATION HEREIN IS.'TRUE“AND CORRECT. SAME WAS EXECUTED AND HANDED TO:PRISON OFFICIALS ON OCTOBER 16, 2025 FOR MAILING TO THE UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT. EXECUTED: October 16, 2025 RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED NicholAs Hansen, TO: United States Supreme Court United States Supreme Court Building 1 First Street, NéE, Washington, D.C. 20543 TO: United States Court of Appeal Second Circuit 40 Foley Square New York, New York 10011 TO: New York State Attorney General Department of Law The Capitol Albany,2N.Y. 12224 TO: Nassau County District Attorney 262 Old Country Road. ; Mineola, N.Y. 11501 UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT Meese ee eee ee x NICHOLAS HANSEN}, Petitioner, against JAMES JGHNSON, Respondent. moe ee ee x I, Nicholas Hansen, the pro se petitioner in the above caption, declare under penalty of perjury,,pursuant to 28 U.S.c. 1756, that on the 16th day of October, 2025, I served three copies of the enclosed motion for an extension of time to file an application for a writ of certiorari to the United States Supreme Court, upon the Respondent, by delivering the same to prison officials located in the Green Haven Correctional Facility at 594 Route 216, Stormville, New York, 12582, All parties required to be served have been served. EXECUTED ON October 16, 2025. Case: 23-6821, 07/29/2025, DktEntry: 75.1, Page 1 of 6 23-6821 Hansen v. Johnson UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT SUMMARY ORDER RULINGS BY SUMMARY ORDER DO NOT HAVE PRECEDENTIAL EFFECT. CITATION TO A SUMMARY ORDER FILED ON OR AFTER JANUARY 1, 2007, IS PERMITTED AND IS GOVERNED BY FEDERAL RULE OF APPELLATE PROCEDURE 32.1 AND THIS COURT’S LOCAL RULE 32.1.1. WHEN CITING A SUMMARY ORDER IN A DOCUMENT FILED WITH THIS COURT, A PARTY MUST CITE EITHER THE FEDERAL