Whether a state court's procedural rules can impose heightened pleading requirements that potentially infringe on a petitioner's constitutional right to access the courts

No question identified. File: Total Pages: 1 TIN THE UNITED STATES SuPREME CoukT Chrurteplar Ts Rehownr Ai Petition / Appellant Elaverth Crevit churt of Appeals Case Mor AN[2630-6 va Kan Burke , Veney Ly, Reception & Medical Center Stese of Florida etal Date:_(O294-224 MOTION FoR LEAVE TO EXCEED PAGE LIMITS ION Cerro nARe PETE en 4. Pursuant to Rule 334) (A) Retrhorer Christopher T, Rohan respectfully requests dhez Aonoralsle court ¥o exceed He 40 page Imct provided 14 Rule 38 @ (@). 2 All istver presavted vole over 250 stlevent enselaws and auther tés fo thoroughly provide entcHlemant andy ustfecten for ther courts grashag oF TAQ Petchen Fer Writ af Certiorert, B.A agunacts aceon point and apply to thir cose, fats and chronology of everts thet (ead thir Cares Challeng er to be before tis Hornorchl, Epurt. 4 Pebitioner preys His Court tebe judieted notiag of Ha opposing parker bad futh ord aceast Aico cloums Het he must include all pelavert fiets and argo mente releting te Froud on te coort anak He hrghtend pleading reg virements, pursuant te Rule (6) fad ri Cer. proadore, Ss, Accordingly, Datchoaar Aeguestr leave to exceed Ha VO Acge,%da9 word fomob in his Petefien Fer unt of Certorari, PROVIDED BY LIBERTY Cl SEP 0 2 202 SEP | 2 2025 SOME cObHT ES FOR MAILING