Whether a district court has the authority to dismiss an appeal as frivolous under 28 U.S.C. § 1915 without providing a detailed explanation of its reasoning

No question identified. : Case: 25-2931, 09/03/2025, DktEntry: 13.1, Page 1 of 1 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS F | L E D SEP 3 2025 MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK U.S. COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT No. 25-2931 D.C. No. §:25-mc-80058-EJD Northern District of California, San Jose ORDER SHIRLEY V. REMMERT and EVA D. REMMERT, Plaintiffs Appellants, Vv. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SAN JOSE, Defendant Appellee. Before: S.R. THOMAS, SILVERMAN, and BENNETT, Circuit Judges. After considering the response to the court’s June 18, 2025 order and the opening brief, we deny the supplemented motion to proceed in forma pauperis (Docket Entry Nos. 3, 5) and dismiss this appeal as frivolous. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a), (e)(2). All other pending motions are denied as moot. No further filings will be entertained in this closed case. DISMISSED.