Whether the First Amendment and due process protections are violated by a court's systematic procedural bias that impairs a pro se litigant's ability to effectively defend against litigation and access judicial resources

No question identified. : On October 10, 2025, I submitted “Motion for Stay” to the Supreme Judicial Court. There has been no response. “An order [by the Lewiston District Court] dated October 23, 2025 ° denied the “Special anti-SLAPP Motion” dated April 8, 2025. Same order denied the “Appeal as of Right — Special Anti-SLAPP Motion” dated May 27, 2025. Same order denied the “Motion to Amend the Special anti-SLAPP Motion” dated October 11, 2025. Same order denied the “Motion to Renew the Special anti-SLAPP Motion” dated October 11, 2025. A Notice of Appeal was submitted on October 27, 2025. On October 31, 2025, a Motion for Stay based on §735 was submitted. November 3, 2025 at 2:19 pm CST, less than 24 hours before a final hearing, I was telephonically informed the final hearing was being continued because of an appeal. Mootness ‘ It does not moot the “systemic bias”. “There is a structural bias “in favor of breaking up our marriage, our relationship, and our family.” | was described as “ ... disturb Buenaventura ... ” [by the Court] in a “final hearing” on September 19, 2025.” “I was informed on September 16, 2025 through a phone call that a “final hearing notice” was mailed out. This connotes a decision was going to be made in the absence of the other party. “[F]inal hearing notice” scheduled on September 19, 2025 was mailed out on August 29, 2025. Twenty (21) days after it's mailing, September 19, 2025, I have not received it in regular mail.” As of [November 7], 2025, I have not reccived the “final hearing notice” scheduled on September 19, 2025.” 99 66, It does not moot the “pervasive” “prejudice”. ““Demonstrable prejudice” are apparent in the consequences, for example, from lack of respect for the sovereignty, independence, and security of others, “improper application of law[s]”, and flouting the US constitution and international laws (eg., Universal Declaration of Human Rights, Convention Against Torture) with impunity.” 9 It does not moot “the deliberate indifference towards the “irreparable harm”. “Dangers of the deliberate indifference for the “irreversible” “adverse consequences” being and will be sustained by an individual who has no “affluence, influence, [preferred] immutable features, approved expression, or belief in 'bidder{s]"” are “palpable”. “This is apparent in its “readiness” “to process” a “[f]inal hearing” on November 4, 2025 while ignoring my request[s] to “dismiss with prejudice” [until I received the denials on October 27, 2025 which was 8 days before the final hearing].” “[‘“Special Anti-Slapp motion”} took [], 6 months, [2] weeks, [1] day[s] or [198] days to generate a result. Leaving only [8] days to [read, review, research, and respond accordingly] was “[orchestrated], coordinated, and carried out” to “harass a [pro se] defendant [unable to find a livelihood “on [his] own”[.]” for nearly nine (9) years] with a legally nonviable claim” and “a factually nonviable one[.]” “expedit[ing]” “substantive consequences: the impairment of First Amendment rights and the time and expense of defending against litigation that has no demonstrable merit.” “This is apparent in its “readiness” “to process” a “[flinal hearing” on November 4, 2025 [where “[I] must appear” in person[.]] while ignoring” “my “choices” (eg. shelter, food, health, nutrition, car repairs, travel, clothes, school choice, university choices, self-improvement, ability to save for a rainy day, retirement) are being “debilitated” by “an enterprise” that “foment[s] an arms race.” On October 9, 2025, a “Motion for Alternative Format For Court Proceeding” conducted by “video” was submitted. It was allowed in an order dated October 13, 2025. I received it on October 17, 2025. “This is apparent in its “readiness” “to process” a “[fJinal hearing” on November 4, 2025 while ignoring my [] motion for summary judgment [until I received the denial on October 27, 2025 which is 8 days before the final hearing and where I submitted my reply to the “Plaintif