Christopher J. Rahaim v. Bruce Bartlett, Individually and in His Official Capacity as State Attorney for the Sixth Judicial Circuit of Florida, et al.
Whether a pro se litigant may seek an extraordinary extension of page limits for a certiorari petition beyond the standard rules of Supreme Court procedure
No question identified. File: Total Pages: 1 PROVIDED BY LIBERTY CI IN THE UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT Christopher I. Rohaim Y Gse Noi Bt~ANAIST ct Bocce Bartlett etel gasir Pe 7 “00 & pf Stoteu of Flarida oe es bi oo SS TION Fo VE TO EXCEE/) PAGE cae LEMITS IN CERTIORARY PETITION i, Porsvant to Role 33(4) (4) Pech fioner Chaistopler ay Rokeim respeetRylly requests this Aororeblecourt to exceed He 10 by: femit in Rule 33 (2) @), 2, All issdes presented invalve aver 200 relevert Caselaws aadavtherter to thorsughly provide edtiHemant and justfication far fkcs courts greating of The Pettian Far Writ of Corhorr}, All argmencts are on point and cpaly “fey the Case , facts andk chonslesy of evexts That lead thic cases chal lenges To be before tis Honaralele Gort, 4 Retr toner applied fr an exteasiorn of Pim, sO perding, Gronted Sy Petihorer proys Hus Court fee judicval nohee of Hy Opposing pochies bad forth and Ceegpet his Clouing thet he must include al] relevent fact and Orqumenty relochag Yo frerd on Ha court and he Aoishtened, pleading rep uiremants, purcvent to rule 4 S) FEAL iy, procedure, 6, Accordingly , Pet toner pag vectc leave to exceed He 4a pose 1 T,060 word [imit in Ars Petition For Writ of Gotorary, Raspectolly Sbmitted: Duals ples Bassa RECEIVED OCT -3 2025 SUPREME dBG GER