Whether a federal appellate court's disposition of consolidated appeals involving overlapping factual and legal questions can materially impact the framing of a subsequent petition for certiorari and the identification of federal questions of exceptional importance

No question identified. : . The Court of Appeals denied Petitioner’s Petition for Rehearing and Petition for Rehearing En Banc on August 19, 2025. See Exhibit A. Under Supreme Court Rule 13.1 and Rule 13.3, the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari runs from the date of denial of rehearing. . Absent an extension, Petitioner’s petition for a writ of certiorari would be due within 90 days of August 19, 2025, i.e., on November 17, 2025. . This Motion / Application for a 60-day extension of time is being deposited in the United States mail, postage prepaid, on November 17, 2025, and thus is postmarked on the 90th day after the denial of rehearing. Under Supreme Court Rule 29.2 (the postmark rule), a document is timely filed if it is sent to the Clerk through the United States Postal Service by first-class, priority, or express mail, postage prepaid, and bears a United States Postal Service postmark showing that it was mailed on or before the last day for filing. . Petitioner therefore respectfully submits that this Motion / Application is timely filed in accordance with Supreme Court Rules 13 and 29.2. Petitioner seeks an extension of 60 days, the maximum period permitted under Supreme Court Rule 13.5, which would extend the time to file the petition for writ of certiorari to and including January 16, 2026. II. BACKGROUND AND