No. 25A619

Jose M. Gonzalez v. Matthew J. Platkin, Attorney General of New Jersey, et al.

Lower Court: Third Circuit
Docketed: 2025-11-25
Status: Application
Type: A
Tags: circuit-court constitutional-rights district-court en-banc-review judicial-conflict petition-for-certiorari
Latest Conference: N/A
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether a circuit court panel's decision that conflicts with a prior United States District Court ruling constitutes a violation of a petitioner's constitutional rights warranting Supreme Court review

Question Presented (from Petition)

No question identified. : UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT Jose M. Gonzales, Petitioner, No.: 707 Special Treatment Unit 8 Production Way PO Box 905 Avenel, NJ 07001 JOSE M. GONZALES, v. THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY, et al. Respondents. U.S. SUPREME COURT, Your Honor: U.S. COURTHOUSE One Fist Street, N.E. Washington, DC 20543-0001 Sat Below: U.S. SUPREME Judge Case Number: Letter Brief For Extension of Another 30 day U.S. Court of Appeals Case No.: 24-2749 Pursuant to Rehearing En Banc Decision Please accept this Letter Brief in lieu of a more formal submission, in support of the Motion to assert that the Petitioner submitted to the U.S. SUPREME Court: A Motion for Certification Centuris pursuant to Rehearing en banc Decision—The majority of the Cercuit in regular service not having voted for rehearing, the petition for rehearing by the Court en banc. See Exhibit 1 (1) The Petitioner respectfully is requesting 30 day extension of time to prepare and to submit to this Court a Petition for Certiorari, to maintain uniformity of the Courts decision. Petitioner submits that the panel's October 31, 2025 decision is in conflict with a United States District Court’s ruling; for this reason the Petitioner seeks review of this Entry of Judgment and violation of his constitutional rights. UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT Jose M. Gonzales, Petitioner, No.: 707 Special Treatment Unit 8 Production Way PO Box 905 Avenel, NJ 07001 JOSE M. GONZALES, v. THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY, et al. Respondents. U.S. SUPREME COURT, Your Honor: U.S. COURTHOUSE One Fist Street, N.E. Washington, DC 20543-0001 Sat Below: U.S. SUPREME Judge Case Number: Letter Brief For Extension of Another 30 day U.S. Court of Appeals Case No.: 24-2749 Pursuant to Rehearing En Banc Decision Please accept this Letter Brief in lieu of a more formal submission, in support of the Motion to assert that the Petitioner submitted to the U.S. SUPREME Court: A Motion for Certification Centuris pursuant to Rehearing en banc Decision—The majority of the Cercuit in regular service not having voted for rehearing, the petition for rehearing by the Court en banc. See Exhibit 1 (1) The Petitioner respectfully is requesting 30 day extension of time to prepare and to submit to this Court a Petition for Certiorari, to maintain uniformity of the Courts decision. Petitioner submits that the panel's October 31, 2025 decision is in conflict with a United States District Court’s ruling; for this reason the Petitioner seeks review of this Entry of Judgment and violation of his constitutional rights. UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT Jose M. Gonzales, Petitioner, No.: 707 Special Treatment Unit 8 Production Way PO Box 905 Avenel, NJ 07001 JOSE M. GONZALES, v. THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY, et al. Respondents. U.S. SUPREME COURT, Your Honor: U.S. COURTHOUSE One Fist Street, N.E. Washington, DC 20543-0001 Sat Below: U.S. SUPREME Judge Case Number: Letter Brief For Extension of Another 30 day U.S. Court of Appeals Case No.: 24-2749 Pursuant to Rehearing En Banc Decision Please accept this Letter Brief in lieu of a more formal submission, in support of the Motion to assert that the Petitioner submitted to the U.S. SUPREME Court: A Motion for Certification Centuris pursuant to Rehearing en banc Decision—The majority of the Cercuit in regular service not having voted for rehearing, the petition for rehearing by the Court en banc. See Exhibit 1 (1) The Petitioner respectfully is requesting 30 day extension of time to prepare and to submit to this Court a Petition for Certiorari, to maintain uniformity of the Courts decision. Petitioner submits that the panel's October 31, 2025 decision is in conflict with a United States District Court’s ruling; for this reason the Petitioner seeks review of this Entry of Judgment and violation of his constitutional rights. UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT Jose M. Gonzales, Petitioner, No.: 707 Special Treatment Unit 8 Production W

Docket Entries

2025-12-01
Application (25A619) granted by Justice Alito extending the time to file until February 28, 2026.
2025-11-18
Application (25A619) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from January 29, 2026 to February 28, 2026, submitted to Justice Alito.
2025-11-12
Application (25A619) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from January 29, 2026 to February 28, 2026, submitted to Justice Alito.

Attorneys

Jose M. Gonzalez
Jose M. Gonzalez — Petitioner
Jose M. Gonzalez — Petitioner