No. 25A702

Mark Alan Deakins v. United States

Lower Court: Sixth Circuit
Docketed: 2025-12-17
Status: Application
Type: A
Experienced Counsel
Tags: circuit-split criminal-law federal-appellate sentencing-enhancement sexual-exploitation statutory-interpretation
Latest Conference: N/A
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether the two-strikes provision of 18 U.S.C. § 2251(e) requires a uniform definition of 'sexual exploitation of children' across federal circuit courts

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

No question identified. : TO: Hon. Brett M. Kavanaugh, Associate Justice of the U.S. Supreme Court and Circuit Justice for the Sixth Circuit Pursuant to Supreme Court Rule 13.5, Petitioner Mark Alan Deaks, by undersigned counsel, respectfully applies for a 45-day extension of time—to and including February 26, 2026—in which to file a petition for writ of certiorari to review the Sixth Circuit’s judgment filed September 10, 2025. Rehearing was denied on October 14, 2025. Copies of the Sixth Circuit’s published opinion and the order denying rehearing are attached. In support of this Application, Mr. Deakins would respectfully show as follows: 1. The Sixth Circuit appointed undersigned counsel pursuant to the Criminal Justice Act of 1964, 18 U.S.C. § 3006A, to represent the indigent Mr. Deakins on an appeal from a federal criminal conviction. Mr. Deakins was sentenced to life plus ten years. 2. At least one potentially viable issue for certiorari exists here: a Petition asking the Court to determine the meaning of “sexual exploitation of children” found in the two-strikes provision of 18 U.S.C. § 2251(e). That issue is the subject of an acknowledged Circuit conflict. See, e.g., United States v. Schopp, 938 F.3d 10538, 1062 n.5 (9th Cir. 2019) (“Our definition of ‘sexual exploitation of children’ as contained in § 2251(e) conflicts with definitions adopted by two other federal appellate courts.” (citations omitted)). See also United States v. Sykes, 65 F.4th 867, 887 (6th Cir. 2023) (rejecting the 9t» Circuit’s position). 3. The current deadline for filing the Petition is January 12, 2026. This Application is timely because it is being filed more than 10 days in advance. 4. A 45-day extension is requested. Undersigned counsel maintains a heavy criminal caseload. Between today’s date and the current date for the Petition, for example, undersigned counsel is scheduled to file six opening briefs in the U.S. Courts of Appeals, in addition to various trialcourt filings and appearances. Further, undersigned counsel has upcoming leave scheduled for the Christmas holiday and has recently transitioned into solo practice. Mr. Deakins has also requested that he be allowed to review and comment on the draft Petition before it is filed, which requires coordination for a legal call with the Bureau of Prisons. CONCLUSION Accordingly, Mr. Deakins respectfully requests that the deadline for his Petition for Writ of Certiorari be extended to and including February 26, 2026. Dated: December 12, 2025 Respectfully submitted, MARK ALAN DEAKINS Howard W. Anderson III CJA Counsel Howard W. Anderson III LAW OFFICE OF HOWARD W. ANDERSON III LLC P.O. Box 661 Pendleton, SC 29670 864-643-5790 CJA Counsel

Docket Entries

2025-12-18
Application (25A702) granted by Justice Kavanaugh extending the time to file until February 26, 2026.
2025-12-12
Application (25A702) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from January 12, 2026 to February 26, 2026, submitted to Justice Kavanaugh.

Attorneys

Mark Alan Deakins
Howard Walton Anderson IIILaw Office of Howard W Anderson III LLC, Petitioner
Howard Walton Anderson IIILaw Office of Howard W Anderson III LLC, Petitioner
United States
D. John SauerSolicitor General, Respondent
D. John SauerSolicitor General, Respondent