Whether the Supreme Court should reconsider its precedent in Liteky v. United States regarding judicial bias and the standard for judicial recusal in light of alleged impermissible prejudicial reasoning by lower courts

No question identified. : 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 1. Introduction May it please this most Honorable Supreme Court of the United States. To the Appellees, the Oregon Bankruptcy Court where this matter originated, the reviewing District Court in Oregon and the appellate panel of the 98 Circuit, please take notice. Comes now Appellant under this Courts’s Rule 13.5 regarding extending time to seek review: For good cause, a Justice may extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari for a period not exceeding 60 days Appellant seeks extension of time for himself alone. No. Application to Extend Time to File for Certiorari to US Supreme Court pg. 2 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2. Jurisdictional Basis for Relief in this Court Ability to proceed in this Court is jurisdictionally correct based on 28 U.S.C. § 1254: Cases in the courts of appeals may be reviewed by the Supreme Court by the following method(s): By writ of certiorari granted upon the petition of any party to any civil or criminal case, before or after rendition of judgment or decree} The 9th Circuit’s decision seeking review is at [EXHIBIT A]. 3. Fixing Due Dates of Certiorari Petition and Within Petition to Extend (Evidence of Appeals Court Decision and Petition for Rehearing) The 9th Circuit Court of Appeals sustained the trial court’s decision on July 30, 2025 [EXHIBIT A]. Thereafter, Rehearing was denied on October 14, 2025 [EXHIBIT B]. This Court’s Rule 13.3 explains the limits of the 90 day period to file for certiorari: No. Application to Extend Time to File for Certiorari to US Supreme Court pg. 3 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 the time to file the petition for a writ of certiorari for all parties (whether or not they requested rehearing or joined in the petition for rehearing) runs from the date of the denial of rehearing Omitting October 14, 2025, then adding 90 days. petition to seek Certiorari review extends until January 12, 2026. a. Due Date of this Petition for Extension Thereby, the within petition for extending time is timely ‘a when filed by January 2, 2026. b. New, Extended Certiorari Petition Due Date Requested Then, pursuant to this Courts’s Rule 13.5: For good cause, a Justice may extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari for a period not exceeding 60 days The new, calculated extended due date is March 13, 2026. No. Application to Extend Time to File for Certiorari to US Supreme Court pg. 4 10 11 12 13 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 No. 8. Justifications and Good Causes for Extending Time The procedures for seeking extension to Petition for Certiorari are also set forth in this Court’s rule 13.5: An application to extend the time to file shall set out the basis for jurisdiction in this Court, identify the judgment sought to be reviewed, include a copy of the opinion and any order respecting rehearing, and set out specific reasons why an extension of time is justified. The application must be fled with the Clerk at least 10 days before the date the petition is due, except in extraordinary circumstances. The application must clearly identify each party for whom an extension is being sought, as any extension that might be granted would apply solely to the party or parties named in the application. On the pages which follow Appellant explains and analyzes some of the good causes justifying delay in the preparation of his Petition for Certiorari. Application to Extend Time to File for Certiorari to US Supreme Court pg. 5 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 No. a. 18‘ Good Cause — Complexity of the Issues The issues in this appeal before are complex, legally challengin and lengthy. The need for Appellant to communicate clearly increases the time needed for proper briefing completion, because crafting each argument requires extensive thought and precision. One measure of good cause is to project matters to be presented in light of the complexity of the issues. Such reasoning is a proper way in which the facts and law of a case can be ful