1. Whether the Seventh Circuit's holding that
accrual of self-incrimination claims based on
statements used at a criminal trial is deferred under
Heck v. Humphrey, 512 U.S. 477 (1994), conflicts with
Wallace v. Kato, 549 U.S. 384 (2007), which holds
that Heck does not apply to claims that accrue before
conviction.

2. Whether, in any event, the Seventh Circuit, in
conflict with Heck and several other circuits,
erroneously held that all section 1983 claims based
on constitutional violations occurring at a criminal
trial that precedes a conviction necessarily imply the
invalidity of that conviction and are therefore barred
by Heck.

Whether the Seventh Circuit's holding that accrual of self-incrimination claims based on statements used at a criminal trial is deferred under Heck v. Humphrey, 512 U.S. 477 (1994), conflicts with Wallace v. Kato, 549 U.S. 384 (2007)