No. 18-1186
Anthony Johnson v. Edward Winstead, et al.
Relisted (2)
Tags: 5th-amendment civil-rights constitutional-claim criminal-procedure criminal-proceedings due-process fifth-amendment heck-v-humphrey inculpatory-statement section-1983 statute-of-limitations unconstitutional-evidence unconstitutional-statement
Key Terms:
FifthAmendment
FifthAmendment
Latest Conference:
2019-06-27
(distributed 2 times)
Related Cases:
18-1013
(Vide)
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the statute of limitations for a Section 1983 claim based on the use of an unconstitutional inculpatory statement begins to run when criminal proceedings terminate in the defendant's favor
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION PRESENTED FOR REVIEW: Does the statute of limitations for Section 1983 claim based on the use of an unconstitutional inculpatory statement begin to run when criminal proceedings terminate in the defendant’s favor?
Docket Entries
2019-06-28
Petition DENIED.
2019-06-26
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/27/2019.
2019-04-30
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/16/2019.
2019-04-12
Brief of respondent Edward Winstead in opposition filed.
2019-03-06
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due April 12, 2019)
Attorneys
Anthony Johnson
Stephen Louis Richards — Law Office of Stephen L. Richards, Petitioner
Stephen Louis Richards — Law Office of Stephen L. Richards, Petitioner
Edward Winstead
Benna Ruth Solomon — Corporation Counsel of the City of Chicago, Respondent
Benna Ruth Solomon — Corporation Counsel of the City of Chicago, Respondent