Whether the court of appeals erred in applying the incorrect Fourth Amendment standard to Mr. Maldonado's traffic stop, where reasonable suspicion did not exist to extend the already-completed stop for a canine sniff, a drive to the nearest checkpoint, or Mr. Maldonado's signing of a consent to search his vehicle

QUESTION PRESENTED The Court of Appeals erred in applying the incorrect Fourth Amendment standard to Mr. Maldonado’s traffic stop. Once the purpose of the traffic stop concluded, reasonable suspicion did not exist to extend the already-completed stop for a canine sniff, a drive to the nearest checkpoint, or Mr. Maldonado’s signing of a consent to search his vehicle.