Whether the plaintiff's complaint of discrimination to the New York State Physicians Board was a protected activity under Title VII

QUESTIONS PRESENTED 1. Whether the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit erred when it held that the Plaintiffs complaint of discrimination to the New York State Physicians Board (NYSPB) was not a protected activity? ; ; 2. Whether the United States Court of . Appeals for the Second Circuit erred when it held that Stony Brook University Hospital (SBUH) is immune under the Eleventh Amendment of the Constitution of the United States from suit in Federal court, disregarding the fact that SBUH is a recipient of Federal financial assistance, and has violated a Federal statute prohibiting discrimination? LIST OF ALL PARTIES . Petitioner: 1. N’Dama Bamba, MD Pro se ; Respondents: 2. Stony Brook University Hospital ; 3. Kimberly Fenton, MD : 4. Barbara D. Underwood, Acting . Attorney General for the State of New York ; 5. Andrew W. Amend, Senior Assistance Solicitor General for the 5 State of New York ; 6. David Lawrence III, Assistance } Solicitor General of Counsel for the : State of New York ;