| 19-7829 |
Dale E. Phillips v. South Coast Plaza, et al. |
Ninth Circuit |
2020-03-03 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
civil-rights civil-rights-discrimination class-action constitutional-rights diversity-jurisdiction due-process equal-protection in-forma-pauperis jurisdiction pro-se-litigation standing state-actor vexatious-litigant |
Whether California's Vexatious Litigant Laws violate the 1st, 8th and 14th Amendments |
| 19-6457 |
D. B. v. Texas Department of Family and Protective Services |
Texas |
2019-10-31 |
Denied |
Relisted (2)IFP |
child-welfare civil-rights civil-rights-discrimination due-process first-amendment fourteenth-amendment parental-rights religious-freedom |
Whether the Texas district court violated the Petitioner's Federal Civil Rights |
| 19-6105 |
Avram Moshe Perry v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., et al. |
Ninth Circuit |
2019-10-01 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
abstention amendment-of-pleadings bankruptcy bankruptcy-procedure civil-procedure civil-rights civil-rights-discrimination due-process equitable-powers federal-jurisdiction judicial-discretion pro-se-plaintiff procedural-due-process standing |
Whether Congress had provided that in an American civilized federal court system a judge can use an unlimited discretion to outrageously discriminate … |
| 18-1391 |
N'Dama Miankanze Bamba v. Kimberly Fenton, et al. |
Second Circuit |
2019-05-03 |
Denied |
Response Waived |
civil-rights civil-rights-discrimination discrimination due-process eleventh-amendment federal-financial-assistance federal-statute physicians-board protected-activity retaliation standing title-vii |
Whether the plaintiff's complaint of discrimination to the New York State Physicians Board was a protected activity under Title VII |