Whether the Fourth Amendment requires reasonable suspicion of speeding based on an officer's ability to provide actual or estimated vehicle speed or other details about the vehicle's movement

QUESTION PRESENTED Whether the Supreme Court of Indiana’s decision was contrary to federal precedent when it held that there was reasonable suspicion to substantiate a warrantless traffic stop of Marshall for speeding pursuant to the Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution when the detaining officer could not provide an actual or estimated vehicle speed nor could he provide any other information concerning the movement of the vehicle to support his contention that Marshall was speeding?