Whether the Fourth Circuit erred in finding that Jessica Roe has standing to seek an injunction against a school program to which she has no ongoing exposure and no non-speculative prospect of future exposure

QUESTIONS PRESENTED In Summers v. Earth Island Institute, 555 U.S. 488 (2009), this Court held that a “vague desire to return ... without any description of concrete plans” is insufficient to establish the requirement of “imminent injury” necessary to provide standing to seek injunctive relief. Jessica Roe stopped attending Mercer County Schools before initiating litigation against it, and has not stated any intention ever to return to the school district in the future, even if an injunction is entered. Did the Fourth Circuit err by finding Roe has standing to seek to enjoin a school program to which she has no ongoing exposure, and no non-speculative prospect of exposure in the future?