| 24-7130 |
Ken Smith v. Kathy Hochul, Governor of New York, et al. |
Second Circuit |
2025-05-05 |
Denied |
IFP |
circuit-precedent constitutional-standing judicial-review pre-challenge ripeness statutory-challenge |
Whether the Second Circuit's decisions conflict with prior circuit precedent concerning the ripeness of a pre-challenge to a statute, whether the Peti… |
| 24-908 |
Fane Lozman v. City of Riviera Beach, Florida |
Eleventh Circuit |
2025-02-24 |
Denied |
Amici (4) |
economic-use land-use-restrictions lucas-doctrine property-rights regulatory-taking ripeness |
Whether a claim that a local ordinance effected a regulatory taking upon enactment remains unripe until the landowner asks the local government for pe… |
| 24-282 |
Minnesota RFL Republican Farmer Labor Caucus, et al. v. Mary Moriarty, in Her Official Capacity as County Attorney for Hennepin County, Minnesota, et al. |
Eighth Circuit |
2024-09-12 |
Denied |
Response Waived |
article-iii-standing declaratory-relief eleventh-amendment ex-parte-young first-amendment ripeness |
Whether there are additional ripeness or imminence requirements under the Ex parte Young exception to Eleventh Amendment immunity in actions for decla… |
| 24-134 |
Lemon Bay Cove, LLC v. United States |
Federal Circuit |
2024-08-06 |
Denied |
Response Waived |
army-corps-of-engineers economic-viability finality just-compensation lucas-doctrine lucas-v-south-carolina permitting property-rights regulatory-takings ripeness takings-clause |
Whether a regulatory takings claim seeking just compensation under Lucas may be defeated by the mere possibility that a permitting authority might hav… |
| 23-1045 |
835 Hinesburg Road, LLC v. City of South Burlington, Vermont, et al. |
Second Circuit |
2024-03-21 |
Denied |
Response RequestedResponse WaivedRelisted (2) |
or whether a property owner is required to submit development-restrictions due-process exhaustion final-decision land-use land-use-permit property-rights regulatory-taking ripeness ripeness-doctrine takings takings-claim |
Whether a takings claim is ripe when a city makes a final decision under existing ordinances denying a land use permit, or whether a property owner is… |
| 23-941 |
In Re First Choice Women's Resource Centers, Inc. |
|
2024-02-28 |
Denied |
Amici (4) |
civil-rights due-process federal-jurisdiction free-speech investigatory-demand pre-litigation-challenge ripeness section-1983 standing state-official |
Whether a section 1983 suit to enjoin an unlawful investigatory demand by a state official is ripe only after a state court has enforced the demand |
| 23A524 |
835 Hinesburg Road, LLC v. City of South Burlington, Vermont, et al. |
Second Circuit |
2023-12-11 |
Presumed Complete |
|
as-applied-claim fifth-amendment fourteenth-amendment land-use regulatory-takings ripeness |
Whether a government's land use decision constitutes a final decision sufficient to render an as-applied regulatory takings claim ripe for federal cou… |
| 23-468 |
Matthew Haney, as Trustee of the Gooseberry Island Trust v. Town of Mashpee, Massachusetts, et al. |
First Circuit |
2023-11-02 |
Denied |
|
civil-procedure constitutional-property-rights due-process government-permit judicial-review prudential-ripeness ripeness standing takings takings-claim variance variance-request |
Can the government evade adjudication of constitutional takings claims on prudential ripeness grounds—after it has twice definitively denied necessary… |
| 22-1224 |
Randy Ralston, et al. v. San Mateo County, California, et al. |
Ninth Circuit |
2023-06-21 |
Denied |
Response Waived |
civil-rights coastal-development due-process government-action land-use-regulation pleading-standards property-rights ripeness ripeness-doctrine takings takings-claim |
Is a takings claim ripe when the government establishes a mandatory process requiring property owners to ask whether any development on their land is … |
| 22-7753 |
Jane Doe, Female Juvenile v. United States |
Tenth Circuit |
2023-06-12 |
Denied |
Relisted (2)IFP |
criminal-procedure cruel-and-unusual-punishment eighth-amendment federal-juvenile-act juvenile-justice juvenile-transfer miller-v-alabama ripeness transfer-to-adult-proceedings |
When a juvenile is charged with first-degree murder, does the transfer to adult proceedings violate the juvenile's Eighth Amendment rights because the… |
| 22-5708 |
David K. Lamb v. Susan Wilson, et al. |
Sixth Circuit |
2022-09-28 |
Dismissed |
Response WaivedIFP |
article-iii case-controversy civil-procedure court-jurisdiction due-process judicial-standing jurisdiction jurisdictional-defect ripeness standing supreme-court-precedent |
Lack-of-standing-is-a-jurisdictional-defect |
| 21-1222 |
Joel David Joseph v. American General Life Insurance Company |
Ninth Circuit |
2022-03-09 |
Denied |
|
california-constitution diversity-jurisdiction erie-doctrine judicial-procedure ninth-circuit oral-argument res-judicata ripeness |
Does the Erie doctrine require oral argument in a diversity case under the California Constitution? |
| 21-439 |
Michael Nance v. Timothy C. Ward, Commissioner, Georgia Department of Corrections, et al. |
Eleventh Circuit |
2021-09-22 |
Judgment Issued |
Amici (7)Relisted (2) |
alternative-execution civil-rights due-process habeas habeas-corpus lethal-injection method-of-execution ripeness section-1983 successive-petition |
Whether an inmate's as-applied method-of-execution challenge must be raised in a habeas petition instead of through a § 1983 action if the inmate plea… |
| 21-5522 |
Meghan Kelly v. Donald J. Trump |
Delaware |
2021-08-30 |
Denied |
IFP |
civil-procedure establishment-clause executive-order free-exercise-of-religion government-religion mootness religious-freedom-restoration-act ripeness service-of-process standing substitution-of-parties |
Whether failure to serve the brief was fatal error |
| 20-1598 |
Project Veritas Action Fund v. Rachael S. Rollins, in Her Official Capacity as District Attorney for Suffolk County, Massachusetts |
First Circuit |
2021-05-17 |
Denied |
Amici (4)Response RequestedResponse WaivedRelisted (2) |
civil-rights facial-overbreadth first-amendment free-speech newsgathering ripeness secret-recording speech-suppression standing |
Whether the First Amendment protects the right to secretly record oral communications |
| 20-6808 |
Thomas Traficante v. United States |
Second Circuit |
2021-01-08 |
Denied |
IFP |
constitutional-challenge constitutional-challenges courts-of-appeals direct-appeal due-process ripeness risk-condition second-circuit sentencing-reform-act sentencing-review supervised-release |
Whether the Second Circuit Court of Appeals erred in denying Traficante's constitutional challenges to his risk condition of supervision as unripe on … |
| 20-5874 |
Jerry Lard v. Arkansas |
Arkansas |
2020-10-01 |
Denied |
IFP |
categorical-prohibition death-penalty eighth-amendment execution intellectual-disability ripeness waiver |
Whether a death-sentenced inmate is permitted to waive a viable claim for an Eighth Amendment categorical probation against the execution of persons w… |
| 19-8032 |
Vaughn Harris v. Metropolitan Government of Nashville and Davidson County, Tennessee, et al. |
Sixth Circuit |
2020-03-18 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
administrative-law civil-procedure civil-rights constitutional-provisions due-process federal-jurisdiction jurisdiction reasons-for-granting-writ ripeness standing statement-of-case statutory-provisions |
Whether the lower court erred in its application of the legal standards for determining standing and ripeness in this case |
| 19-1057 |
Lori Rodriguez, et al. v. City of San Jose, California, et al. |
Ninth Circuit |
2020-02-25 |
Denied |
Amici (2)Response RequestedRelisted (3) |
civil-rights community-caretaking constitutional-rights fourth-amendment fourth-amendment-search-and-seizure immediate-threat issue-preclusion ripeness search-and-seizure second-amendment timely-warrant warrant-requirement |
Whether the Fourth Amendment allows an exception to its warrant requirement for so-called 'community caretaking' where the alleged danger to the commu… |
| 19-7586 |
Sean M. Donahue v. Pennsylvania Civil Service Commission |
Pennsylvania |
2020-02-06 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
administrative-law case-or-controversy civil-procedure civil-rights civil-service due-process employment-law free-speech mootness public-employment ripeness standing statutory-interpretation veterans-rights voluntary-cessation |
Is the underlying case moot? |
| 18-1531 |
South Carolina v. United States, et al. |
Fourth Circuit |
2019-06-11 |
Denied |
Amici (1) |
administrative-law civil-procedure department-of-energy environmental-law environmental-policy federal-jurisdiction nuclear-energy ripeness separation-of-powers standing standing-doctrine statutory-interpretation |
Whether the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit erred in holding that South Carolina lacked standing to challenge the DOE's final ac… |
| 18-1487 |
Mercer County Board of Education, et al. v. Elizabeth Deal, et al. |
Fourth Circuit |
2019-05-30 |
Denied |
Amici (1)Response RequestedResponse WaivedRelisted (2) |
case-or-controversy circuit-split civil-procedure exposure imminent-injury injunctive-relief mootness ripeness school school-program standing voluntary-cessation |
Whether the Fourth Circuit erred in finding that Jessica Roe has standing to seek an injunction against a school program to which she has no ongoing e… |
| 18A1198 |
Lynn Lumbard, et al. v. City of Ann Arbor, Michigan |
Sixth Circuit |
2019-05-20 |
Presumed Complete |
|
constitutional-interpretation federal-claims property-rights ripeness state-court-remedies takings-clause |
Whether the Court should reconsider the exhaustion requirement for federal takings claims under Williamson County |
| 18-294 |
Nicholas Honchariw v. County of Stanislaus, California, et al. |
Ninth Circuit |
2018-09-07 |
GVR |
Response RequestedResponse WaivedRelisted (3) |
due-process final-determination ripeness state-court-procedures subdivision subdivision-approval taking-claims takings takings-clause williamson-county |
Whether taking and due process claims arising from a subdivision disapproval ripen under Williamson County Regional Planning Commission et al. v. Hami… |
| 18-197 |
E. K. Wade v. R. Alexander Acosta, Secretary of Labor, et al. |
Ninth Circuit |
2018-08-14 |
Denied |
Response Waived |
administrative-law civil-procedure civil-rights constitutional-law constitutional-rights department-of-labor due-process federal-courts federal-tort-claims-act judicial-discretion pre-filing-order preliminary-injunction ripeness standing title-vii |
Whether Petitioner, at the time of his personal injuries, was a private citizen and not an employee subject to exclusive remedy under Title VII |