takings-claim

15 cases — ← All topics

Case Title Lower Court Docketed Status Flags Tags Question Presented
24-997 James Doyle, dba Rocky Mountain Ventures, dba Environmental Land Technologies, Ltd. v. United States Federal Circuit 2025-03-19 Denied Amici (1)Response Waived administrative-exhaustion federal-circuit property-rights regulatory-action ripeness-doctrine takings-claim Whether a regulatory takings claim against the United States is ripe when a property owner demonstrates de facto finality and without obtaining the go…
24-736 Village Communities, LLC, et al. v. San Diego County, California, et al. Ninth Circuit 2025-01-13 Denied Response Waived fifth-amendment inverse-condemnation land-use-permit property-rights takings-claim unconstitutional-conditions Whether the Ninth Circuit's holding improperly requires a land use permit applicant to show government permit conditions would coerce surrender of pro…
23-1260 Douglas Bruce v. Ogden City Corporation, et al. Tenth Circuit 2024-06-03 Denied Response Waived 14th-amendment civil-procedure civil-rights due-process municipal-action property-rights section-1983 standing statute-of-limitations takings takings-claim Whether the statute of limitations for a Section 1983 takings claim for the unconstitutional deprivation of private property can begin to run before t…
23A886 PPI Enterprises, LLC v. Town of Windham New Hampshire 2024-04-05 Presumed Complete development-denial inverse-condemnation property-rights site-plan takings-claim zoning-ordinance Whether a property owner's takings claim is ripe when a local planning board repeatedly denies site plan applications through discretionary review tha…
23-1045 835 Hinesburg Road, LLC v. City of South Burlington, Vermont, et al. Second Circuit 2024-03-21 Denied Response RequestedResponse WaivedRelisted (2) or whether a property owner is required to submit development-restrictions due-process exhaustion final-decision land-use land-use-permit property-rights regulatory-taking ripeness ripeness-doctrine takings takings-claim Whether a takings claim is ripe when a city makes a final decision under existing ordinances denying a land use permit, or whether a property owner is…
23-468 Matthew Haney, as Trustee of the Gooseberry Island Trust v. Town of Mashpee, Massachusetts, et al. First Circuit 2023-11-02 Denied civil-procedure constitutional-property-rights due-process government-permit judicial-review prudential-ripeness ripeness standing takings takings-claim variance variance-request Can the government evade adjudication of constitutional takings claims on prudential ripeness grounds—after it has twice definitively denied necessary…
22-1224 Randy Ralston, et al. v. San Mateo County, California, et al. Ninth Circuit 2023-06-21 Denied Response Waived civil-rights coastal-development due-process government-action land-use-regulation pleading-standards property-rights ripeness ripeness-doctrine takings takings-claim Is a takings claim ripe when the government establishes a mandatory process requiring property owners to ask whether any development on their land is …
22-872 Evans Creek, LLC v. City of Reno, Nevada Ninth Circuit 2023-03-13 Denied Amici (1) constitutional-law constitutional-property due-process land-use-regulation penn-central penn-central-test property-rights regulatory-taking regulatory-takings takings takings-claim Whether a property owner states a valid takings claim by alleging that a regulation substantially deprives the owner of the right to use property, or …
22-228 In Re Urvashi Bhagat 2022-09-12 Denied Response Waived administrative-law agency-immunity bad-faith damages federal-jurisdiction judicial-discretion mandamus patent-examination patent-rights takings takings-claim Whether the District Court abused discretion and obstructed justice
22-229 In Re Brian D. Swanson 2022-09-12 Denied 17th-amendment administrative-law article-5 article-five 22-228" article-five-consent constitutional-interpretation constitutional-ratification equal-suffrage federal-question-jurisdiction georgia judicial-discretion patent-rights popular-elections senate-elections senate-representation seventeenth-amendment state-consent subject-matter-jurisdiction takings-claim Whether the District Court abused discretion in di Does the Seventeenth Amendment deprive the State of Georgia of its equal suffrage in the Senate, requiring its consent under Article 5 of the Constitu…
21-1478 Nicholas Honchariw v. County of Stanislaus, California, et al. Ninth Circuit 2022-05-24 Denied Response Waived constitutional-interpretation due-process finality-requirement finality-ripeness knick pakdel ripeness-doctrine supreme-court-precedent takings takings-claim williamson-county Whether Knick v. Township of Scott, 139 S.Ct. 2162 (2019) and Pakdel v. City and Cty. of San Francisco, 141 S.Ct. 2226 (2021) have sanctioned a pervas…
21-70 Gary E. Albright, et al. v. United States Federal Circuit 2021-07-19 Denied Amici (1)Response Waived certification constitutional-federalism erie-doctrine fifth-amendment railroad-deed state-law state-law-interpretation takings-claim takings-clause Does constitutional federalism require certification of state law issue?
20-1235 Burgoyne, LLC v. Chicago Terminal Railroad Company, et al. Illinois 2021-03-08 Denied Response Waived due-process easement-termination national-trails-system-act property-rights state-court-split state-courts surface-transportation-board takings takings-claim Whether the National Trails System Act precludes state courts from resolving competing claims to property rights
20-1212 Peyman Pakdel, et ux. v. City and County of San Francisco, California, et al. Ninth Circuit 2021-03-03 GVR Amici (3)Relisted (4) 42-usc-1983 administrative-remedies exhaustion-of-remedies finality-requirement land-use-regulation property-rights regulatory-takings takings-claim unconstitutional-conditions williamson-county Whether a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 takings claim is ripe under Williamson County's finality requirement when a city has definitively and unalterably imposed a…
19-150 Lynn Lumbard, et al. v. City of Ann Arbor, Michigan Sixth Circuit 2019-08-01 Denied Response Waived 42-usc-1983 5th-amendment federal-court-review fifth-amendment just-compensation loretto-v-teleprompter permanent-physical-occupation physical-occupation san-remo-hotel state-court-exhaustion takings takings-claim takings-clause Whether Petitioners' Takings Clause claim should be reinstated