| 25-726 |
Alan Lane Hicks v. Jonathan Frame, Superintendent, Mount Olive Correctional Complex |
Fourth Circuit |
2025-12-19 |
Pending |
Amici (1)Response RequestedResponse Waived |
aedpa federal-petition habeas-corpus ineffective-process judicial-delay state-court-exhaustion |
Whether 28 U.S.C. § 2254(b)(1)(B)(ii)'s exception to the exhaustion requirement for "circumstances" that render state proceedings "ineffective" can ap… |
| 24-6928 |
In Re Stanley Howard Solvey |
|
2025-04-04 |
Denied |
IFP |
constitutional-rights discretionary-review exceptional-circumstances habeas-corpus miscarriage-of-justice state-court-exhaustion |
Whether circumstances exist that render state court exhaustion ineffective to protect the applicant's rights, and whether ongoing constitutional viola… |
| 24-6668 |
Chad Alan Lee v. Ryan Thornell, Director, Arizona Department of Corrections, Rehabilitation and Reentry |
Ninth Circuit |
2025-02-27 |
Denied |
IFP |
agency-relationship federal-habeas ineffective-assistance post-conviction-relief procedural-default state-court-exhaustion |
Whether attorney abandonment in state PCR proceedings excuses a petitioner's failure to develop factual basis of a claim under 28 U.S.C § 2254(e)(2) |
| 22-5184 |
Dwayne Stoutamire v. Tim Shoop, Warden |
Sixth Circuit |
2022-07-26 |
Denied |
Response RequestedRelisted (3)IFP |
appellate-review certificate-of-appealability civil-procedure due-process habeas-corpus procedural-default section-2253 standard-of-review state-court-exhaustion |
Whether the court of appeals properly applied Section 2253 of the Certificate of Appealability statute |
| 19-5612 |
Steven Wayne Isbel v. Lorie Davis, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division |
Fifth Circuit |
2019-08-16 |
Denied |
IFP |
circuit-court civil-rights constitutional-claims discretionary-review document-production due-process equal-protection habeas-corpus ineffective-assistance jury-instructions separation-of-powers standard-of-review state-court-exhaustion |
Whether the district court and the 5th circuit were correct that Isbel did not properly preserve and exhaust his ineffective assistance of trial couns… |
| 19-150 |
Lynn Lumbard, et al. v. City of Ann Arbor, Michigan |
Sixth Circuit |
2019-08-01 |
Denied |
Response Waived |
42-usc-1983 5th-amendment federal-court-review fifth-amendment just-compensation loretto-v-teleprompter permanent-physical-occupation physical-occupation san-remo-hotel state-court-exhaustion takings takings-claim takings-clause |
Whether Petitioners' Takings Clause claim should be reinstated |
| 19-5360 |
Curtis Nairn v. Mark S. Inch, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections, et al. |
Eleventh Circuit |
2019-07-26 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
civil-rights counsel counsel-assistance due-process exhaustion-of-remedies florida-corrections florida-department-of-corrections futility-doctrine habeas-corpus prisoner-rights spencer-sanction spencer-sanctions standing state-court-exhaustion state-courts |
Whether it would be futile for a prisoner to return to State Courts to have unexhausted claims exhausted with the assistance of counsel Under Florida … |
| 19-5170 |
Phillip J. Rosenblum v. Martin Biter, Warden |
Ninth Circuit |
2019-07-16 |
Denied |
IFP |
actual-innocence civil-rights constitutional-claim due-process federal-courts federal-review habeas-corpus procedural-default reopening-deadline state-court-exhaustion successive-petitions |
Whether a petitioner with an 'actual innocence' claim can be barred from review and treated as if successive petitions that have not been adjudicated … |