No. 19-5360

Curtis Nairn v. Mark S. Inch, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections, et al.

Lower Court: Eleventh Circuit
Docketed: 2019-07-26
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: civil-rights counsel counsel-assistance due-process exhaustion-of-remedies florida-corrections florida-department-of-corrections futility-doctrine habeas-corpus prisoner-rights spencer-sanction spencer-sanctions standing state-court-exhaustion state-courts
Key Terms:
CriminalProcedure HabeasCorpus
Latest Conference: 2019-10-01
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether it would be futile for a prisoner to return to State Courts to have unexhausted claims exhausted with the assistance of counsel Under Florida Spencer Sanction law based on the explicit language itself

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED Whether it would be futile for a prisoner to return to State Courts to have unexhausted claims exhausted with the assistance of counsel Under Florida Spencer Sanction law based on the explicit language itself. ii PARTIES The Petitioner is Curtis Nairn, a prisoner at Everglades Correctional facility in Miami, Florida. The respondents Julie Jones, Secretary Florida Department of Corrections has been replaced by Mark S. Inch. The new Secretary Florida Department of Corrections. Attorney General, State of Florida iii

Docket Entries

2019-10-07
Petition DENIED.
2019-08-08
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/1/2019.
2019-07-31
Waiver of right of respondent Inch, Sec., FL DOC to respond filed.
2019-07-18
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due August 26, 2019)

Attorneys

Curtis Nairn, et al.
Curtis Nairn — Petitioner
Inch, Sec., FL DOC
Celia A. Terenzio — Respondent