No. 22-5184
Dwayne Stoutamire v. Tim Shoop, Warden
Response RequestedRelisted (3)IFP
Tags: appellate-review certificate-of-appealability civil-procedure due-process habeas-corpus procedural-default section-2253 standard-of-review state-court-exhaustion
Key Terms:
HabeasCorpus
HabeasCorpus
Latest Conference:
2023-03-17
(distributed 3 times)
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the court of appeals properly applied Section 2253 of the Certificate of Appealability statute
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
No question identified. : Questions ErUsantad | a ae Do a paritiones need to dotom oO Ccattifitate of | appestabdrtity Sear the duriol of oe Civ via bo (b) motion 2 O13 sho couct of AppaUmls properly apply Section 2253 | ¢ tho. Cec takie ato of Appuclab ivy statute 2 bs) e fhe {ower courds IWMProperly apphed a protadurat defaults \ clon Mar Wad Efoper ly presentad to the State courts bo ; the courts apply o Mofe lument appl cation of = the car 97 prs Case 1S GY of pstrce pule % | | |
Docket Entries
2023-03-20
Rehearing DENIED.
2023-03-01
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/17/2023.
2023-02-09
Petition for Rehearing filed.
2023-01-17
Petition DENIED.
2022-12-29
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/13/2023.
2022-12-15
Brief of respondent Tim Shoop, Warden in opposition filed.
2022-09-19
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including December 16, 2022.
2022-09-16
Motion to extend the time to file a response from October 17, 2022 to December 16, 2022, submitted to The Clerk.
2022-09-15
Response Requested. (Due October 17, 2022)
2022-09-08
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/28/2022.
2022-07-14
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due August 25, 2022)
Attorneys
Dwayne Stoutamire
Dwayne Stoutamire — Petitioner
Tim Shoop, Warden
Michael Jason Hendershot — Ohio Attorney General's Office, Respondent
Stephanie Lynn Watson — Attorney General of Ohio, Respondent